Re: [PHP-DEV] Another tiny syntax patch

2009-07-26 Thread Gwynne Raskind
On Jul 26, 2009, at 5:17 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: We have talked about this before, and the conclusion was that if we are going to have an invalid PI, we might as well make it just as invalid as chars. I prefer strong namespacing of all my tags. "generic and could be usurped by any other (ad

Re: [PHP-DEV] Another tiny syntax patch

2009-07-26 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
We have talked about this before, and the conclusion was that if we are going to have an invalid PI, we might as well make it For the sake of the heck of it, I'm gonna offer up this tiny patch I'm > using in one of my projects. I don't really care if it gets included in > anything or not, just tho

[PHP-DEV] Another tiny syntax patch

2009-07-26 Thread Gwynne Raskind
For the sake of the heck of it, I'm gonna offer up this tiny patch I'm using in one of my projects. I don't really care if it gets included in anything or not, just thought it might interest someone. Effect: Adds a "works without the use of short_tags. Caveat: The formation "2.6 of [1] define