On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:21 PM Claude Pache
wrote:
>
>
> > Le 16 déc. 2019 à 10:58, George Peter Banyard a écrit
> :
> >
> > Greetings internals,
> >
> > I'm here to get internals's opinion about allowing a string offset to be
> > replaced with arbitrary strings.
> >
> > Since forever strings
pon., 16 gru 2019 o 10:58 George Peter Banyard napisał(a):
> Greetings internals,
>
> I'm here to get internals's opinion about allowing a string offset to be
> replaced with arbitrary strings.
>
> Since forever strings with more then one byte have been truncated silently
> to one byte. The case
> Le 16 déc. 2019 à 10:58, George Peter Banyard a écrit :
>
> Greetings internals,
>
> I'm here to get internals's opinion about allowing a string offset to be
> replaced with arbitrary strings.
>
> Since forever strings with more then one byte have been truncated silently
> to one byte. The
Greetings internals,
I'm here to get internals's opinion about allowing a string offset to be
replaced with arbitrary strings.
Since forever strings with more then one byte have been truncated silently
to one byte. The case with empty string *kinda* was existent but had a
buggy behaviour (see bug
