On Sun, Sep 18, 2022, at 3:00 AM, Karoly Negyesi wrote:
>> We are therefore going to proceed with `public private(set)`, the same
> syntax as Swift and the current RFC text use.
>
> It seems my previous email went to /dev/null.
>
> This is incomprehensible.
>
> Go with public(get) private(set) plea
> We are therefore going to proceed with `public private(set)`, the same
syntax as Swift and the current RFC text use.
It seems my previous email went to /dev/null.
This is incomprehensible.
Go with public(get) private(set) please.
"public private" makes no sense.
