Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:07 PM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com < guilhermebla...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 on (a) > > It's perfectly normal to have issues fixed between last RC and GA. > > []s, it's not a clear cut. you can get away with doing that but the point of the RCs is that allow the general pub

Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

+1 on (a) It's perfectly normal to have issues fixed between last RC and GA. []s, On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Bishop Bettini wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Anatol Belski > wrote: > > > a) release on 26th including all known bug fixes > > b) do RC8, assume there are no bugs, s

Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Anatol Belski wrote: > a) release on 26th including all known bug fixes > b) do RC8, assume there are no bugs, so target 10th for RTM > c) do RC8, release on 3rd, expect there are no bugs come in > d) continue issuing release candidates till it's stable enough (ne

Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

On 24.11.2015, at 12:57, Leigh wrote: > I prefer a over c. > > As you said, we can deliver a stable and high quality 7.0.0 today. An RC > period where you expect no bugs does not sound productive to me. That is exactly the point of an RC. No show-stoppers means you then roll the RC out as the

Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

Hey: On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Leigh wrote: > On 23 November 2015 at 21:10, Anatol Belski wrote: > > > a) release on 26th including all known bug fixes > > b) do RC8, assume there are no bugs, so target 10th for RTM > > c) do RC8, release on 3rd, expect there are no bugs come in > > d) c

Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

On 23 November 2015 at 21:10, Anatol Belski wrote: > a) release on 26th including all known bug fixes > b) do RC8, assume there are no bugs, so target 10th for RTM > c) do RC8, release on 3rd, expect there are no bugs come in > d) continue issuing release candidates till it's stable enough (needs

Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Anatol Belski wrote: > > a) release on 26th including all known bug fixes > b) do RC8, assume there are no bugs, so target 10th for RTM > c) do RC8, release on 3rd, expect there are no bugs come in > d) continue issuing release candidates till it's stable enough

Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote: > >> On 24 בנוב׳ 2015, at 7:18, Davey Shafik wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Sebastian Bergmann >> wrote: >> On 11/23/2015 10:10 PM, Anatol Belski wrote: c) do RC8, release on 3rd, expect there are no bugs come in

Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

> On 24 בנוב׳ 2015, at 7:18, Davey Shafik wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Sebastian Bergmann > wrote: > >>> On 11/23/2015 10:10 PM, Anatol Belski wrote: >>> >>> c) do RC8, release on 3rd, expect there are no bugs come in >> >> +1 > > > +1 +1 With one important mod - of course

Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

+1 C On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 6:18 AM, Davey Shafik wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Sebastian Bergmann > wrote: > > > On 11/23/2015 10:10 PM, Anatol Belski wrote: > > > >> c) do RC8, release on 3rd, expect there are no bugs come in > >> > > > > +1 > > > +1 >

Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > On 11/23/2015 10:10 PM, Anatol Belski wrote: > >> c) do RC8, release on 3rd, expect there are no bugs come in >> > > +1 +1

Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

On 11/23/2015 10:10 PM, Anatol Belski wrote: c) do RC8, release on 3rd, expect there are no bugs come in +1 -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

On 23.11.2015, at 22:10, Anatol Belski wrote: > So in the end, a solution is wanted. I don't think any opinion is allowed to > be ignored for such a topic. So options > > a) release on 26th including all known bug fixes > b) do RC8, assume there are no bugs, so target 10th for RTM > c) do RC8,

Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

Good guy in php.internals (Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:45:38 +): >when is it available from Windows binaries download site? It still says >this: > >7 has no release 7 has no release, but RC7 is here: http://windows.php.net/qa/ -- Jan -- PHP I

Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Good guy wrote: > On 23/11/2015 21:10, Anatol Belski wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> it is sad to see that the discussion went in the direction it went, but >> I'm glad to have missed that being away all day and at the end of it >> realizing my mail server messed up. Pleas

Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

On 23/11/2015 21:10, Anatol Belski wrote: Hi, it is sad to see that the discussion went in the direction it went, but I'm glad to have missed that being away all day and at the end of it realizing my mail server messed up. Please lets get the tone down and discuss factually! I would like to t

Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

On November 23, 2015 10:10:37 PM GMT+01:00, Anatol Belski wrote: >Hi, > >it is sad to see that the discussion went in the direction it went, but >I'm glad to have missed that being away all day and at the end of it >realizing my mail server messed up. Please lets get the tone down and >discuss fa

Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

Hi! > So in the end, a solution is wanted. I don't think any opinion is > allowed to be ignored for such a topic. So options > > a) release on 26th including all known bug fixes > b) do RC8, assume there are no bugs, so target 10th for RTM > c) do RC8, release on 3rd, expect there are no bugs com

[PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release

Hi, it is sad to see that the discussion went in the direction it went, but I'm glad to have missed that being away all day and at the end of it realizing my mail server messed up. Please lets get the tone down and discuss factually! I would like to turn back to the point I was depicting in my