hi Bill,
2012/1/20 William A. Rowe Jr. :
> On 1/19/2012 5:29 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> 2012/1/19 Ángel González :
>>
>>> Such binaries wouldn't be compatible with IIS, but mingw seems preferible
>>> to the legacy VC6 for use with the oficial Apache binaries.
>
> A couple of things to remember; msv
On 1/19/2012 5:29 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> 2012/1/19 Ángel González :
>
>> Such binaries wouldn't be compatible with IIS, but mingw seems preferible
>> to the legacy VC6 for use with the oficial Apache binaries.
A couple of things to remember; msvcrt.dll is quite actively maintained,
even when it
2012/1/19 Ángel González :
> Actually, why couldn't mingw be supported one day?
> (supposing someone did the work to change half the PHP_WIN defines to
> PHP_MSVC)
Too painful, somehow buggy (while it is way better lately) but the
main reason is total lack of binary compatibility with supported V
On 18/01/12 20:35, Pierre Joye wrote:
Actually, no. There are any number of free mechanisms to build 64 bit code.
None of them are part of what we support tho' (we do not support mingw
for example, and won't support it).
Actually, why couldn't mingw be supported one day?
(supposing someone did
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Niel Archer wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>> wrote:
>>
>> > The SDK and DDK remain free with a minimal toolchain, including 64 bit
>> > compilers. Of course they aren't called that anymore, because things
>> > are only fun in the
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
>
> > The SDK and DDK remain free with a minimal toolchain, including 64 bit
> > compilers. Of course they aren't called that anymore, because things
> > are only fun in the Windows world when they overhaul the glossary of
> > terms
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> The SDK and DDK remain free with a minimal toolchain, including 64 bit
> compilers. Of course they aren't called that anymore, because things
> are only fun in the Windows world when they overhaul the glossary of
> terms every 3 years
hi,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:37 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 1/18/2012 6:13 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
>>
>> A much better reason for not supporting the build is probably that the 64bit
>> compiler is
>> not available in the free development stack? We have to buy a development
>> stack to
On 1/18/2012 12:14 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
> William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> On 1/18/2012 6:13 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
>>> >
>>> > A much better reason for not supporting the build is probably that the
>>> > 64bit
>>> compiler is
>>> > not available in the free development stack? We have to buy a
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/18/2012 6:13 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
>
> A much better reason for not supporting the build is probably that the 64bit
compiler is
> not available in the free development stack? We have to buy a development
stack to get the
> 64bit compiler which blocks rather
On 1/18/2012 6:13 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
>
> A much better reason for not supporting the build is probably that the 64bit
> compiler is
> not available in the free development stack? We have to buy a development
> stack to get the
> 64bit compiler which blocks rather than working with the publi
Perfect, thanks.
And to be fair, I don't care about performance. I would like 64 bit integers...
Anthony
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi,
>
> Yes, there is a reason.
>
> We do not support x64 binaries yet, for php itself and many libs used
> by PHP. Some argues that it
Pierre Joye wrote:
Lester,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
Pierre Joye wrote:
Yes, there is a reason.
We do not support x64 binaries yet, for php itself and many libs used
by PHP. Some argues that it is safe. Btw, it is not faster to run on
x64 either.
Pierre ... ple
Lester,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Pierre Joye wrote:
>>
>> Yes, there is a reason.
>>
>> We do not support x64 binaries yet, for php itself and many libs used
>> by PHP. Some argues that it is safe. Btw, it is not faster to run on
>> x64 either.
>
>
> Pierre ... plea
Pierre Joye wrote:
Yes, there is a reason.
We do not support x64 binaries yet, for php itself and many libs used
by PHP. Some argues that it is safe. Btw, it is not faster to run on
x64 either.
Pierre ... please do not continue that statement without any evidence. ALL of
the benchmarks I've r
hi,
Yes, there is a reason.
We do not support x64 binaries yet, for php itself and many libs used
by PHP. Some argues that it is safe. Btw, it is not faster to run on
x64 either.
php-next will have x64 support tho'.
Cheers,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> Hello all,
Hello all,
I've noticed that on windows.php.net that all the builds are x86. I
was wondering if there is any reason (technical or not) not to
distribute x64 builds as well there. It's quite annoying having to
constantly drop to a VM every time I need to test something that's 64
bit dependent...
17 matches
Mail list logo
