Ah-ha, excellent. I'll get reading.
With the the current 5.3.4 effort occupying peoples time and other constraints
I'll probably leave proposing anything until the new year.
If anyone has any suggestions in the meantime I'd be glad to hear them.
James B
On 6 Nov 2010, at 02:11, "Herman Radtke"
> Stas - quick question - what is a PEP?
Python Enhancement Proposal
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/
There is even a PEP for PEP.
--
Herman Radtke
hermanrad...@gmail.com | http://hermanradtke.com
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.ne
ds to move somewhere else, let me know
Regards,
James
-Original Message-
From: Stas Malyshev [mailto:smalys...@sugarcrm.com]
Sent: 16 September 2010 18:56
To: Christian Kaps
Cc: Frederic Hardy; James Butler; internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] More formal feature request cycl
Hi!
This thought is brought on mainly by watching the annotations
drama that is currently occupying internals, does anyone else
agree it might be a good idea to have a slightly more formal
procedure for requesting features and then recording votes pros,
cons, side effects, etc. against it. It mi
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:10:21 +0200, Frederic Hardy
wrote:
> Hello !
>> This thought is brought on mainly by watching the annotations drama that is
>> currently occupying internals, does anyone else agree it might be a good
>> idea to have a slightly more formal procedure for requesting features
Hello !
This thought is brought on mainly by watching the annotations drama that is
currently occupying internals, does anyone else agree it might be a good idea
to have a slightly more formal procedure for requesting features and then
recording votes pros, cons, side effects, etc. against it.
This thought is brought on mainly by watching the annotations drama that is
currently occupying internals, does anyone else agree it might be a good idea
to have a slightly more formal procedure for requesting features and then
recording votes pros, cons, side effects, etc. against it. It might
