On 22/03/15 08:54, Patrick Schaaf wrote:
>> Sure, I can agree on RFC all the things.
> Probably not all things, but surely everything visible at the language
> level, that would need documentation. Syntax, functions, function argument
> changes. Probably also changes of official C level API for mod
On Mar 22, 2015 3:45 PM, "Leigh" wrote:
>
> On 22 March 2015 at 07:00, Patrick Schaaf wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. Is that really the line to be drawn? An RFC, by itself, provides a
> > good point to spell out a change clearly, and anchor it for reference in
> > discussion. Discussion on internals itself
On 22 March 2015 at 08:54, Patrick Schaaf wrote:
>
> Okay, that's easier to implement and probably sufficient, if everybody
> play nice. Or, another idea and maybe a lot less work to implement: all
> active release managers could have a "want a vote" button on pending RFC
> pages.
>
+1 on RM sign
Am 22.03.2015 09:45 schrieb "Leigh" :
>
> On 22 March 2015 at 07:00, Patrick Schaaf wrote:
>>
>> Hmm. Is that really the line to be drawn? An RFC, by itself, provides a
good point to spell out a change clearly, and anchor it for reference in
discussion. Discussion on internals itself cannot provid
On 22 March 2015 at 07:00, Patrick Schaaf wrote:
>
> Hmm. Is that really the line to be drawn? An RFC, by itself, provides a
> good point to spell out a change clearly, and anchor it for reference in
> discussion. Discussion on internals itself cannot provide that, it is too
> scattered, and POC c
On Mar 22, 2015 2:01 PM, "Patrick Schaaf" wrote:
>
> Am 22.03.2015 02:30 schrieb "Leigh" :
> >
> > Yep, this does look like another case of simply ignoring rules. The fact
> > that what does and does not require an RFC does not help, this probably
> > didn't need one, however one was created and t
Am 22.03.2015 02:30 schrieb "Leigh" :
>
> Yep, this does look like another case of simply ignoring rules. The fact
> that what does and does not require an RFC does not help, this probably
> didn't need one, however one was created and the rules need to be stuck
to.
Hmm. Is that really the line to
On 21 March 2015 at 12:30, Peter Cowburn wrote:
> On 21 March 2015 at 08:14, Xinchen Hui wrote:
>
> > Hey:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
> > > Hey:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Alain Williams
> > wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:46:58PM +11
Hi,
2015-03-21 19:30 GMT+01:00 Marc Bennewitz :
> I also had a question! Didn't you noticed it?
>
> Am 20.03.2015 um 16:49 schrieb Marc Bennewitz:
>>
>> Why not simply allow the callback to be an array, too?
Because arrays are valid callbacks. [$object, 'cb'] would call the the
'cb' method on the
I also had a question! Didn't you noticed it?
Am 20.03.2015 um 16:49 schrieb Marc Bennewitz:
Why not simply allow the callback to be an array, too?
Marc
Am 21.03.2015 um 09:14 schrieb Xinchen Hui:
Hey:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
Hey:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:53
On 21 March 2015 at 08:14, Xinchen Hui wrote:
> Hey:
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
> > Hey:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Alain Williams
> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:46:58PM +1100, Pierre Joye wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Wei Dai
Hey:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
> Hey:
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Alain Williams wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:46:58PM +1100, Pierre Joye wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Wei Dai wrote:
>>> > Hi internals,
>>> >> Hi internals,
>>> >>
>>> >> T
Am 20.03.2015 um 09:03 schrieb Wei Dai:
Hi internals,
Hi internals,
The RFC to add a user-land function for an easy-to-use and reliable
preg_replace_callback_array() in PHP is up for discussion:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/preg_replace_callback_array
This proposes adding one function: `pre
Hey:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Alain Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:46:58PM +1100, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Wei Dai wrote:
>> > Hi internals,
>> >> Hi internals,
>> >>
>> >> The RFC to add a user-land function for an easy-to-use and reliable
>>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:46:58PM +1100, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Wei Dai wrote:
> > Hi internals,
> >> Hi internals,
> >>
> >> The RFC to add a user-land function for an easy-to-use and reliable
> >> preg_replace_callback_array() in PHP is up for discussion:
> >> htt
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Wei Dai wrote:
> Hi internals,
>> Hi internals,
>>
>> The RFC to add a user-land function for an easy-to-use and reliable
>> preg_replace_callback_array() in PHP is up for discussion:
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/preg_replace_callback_array
>>
>> This proposes addin
Hi internals,
> Hi internals,
>
> The RFC to add a user-land function for an easy-to-use and reliable
> preg_replace_callback_array() in PHP is up for discussion:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/preg_replace_callback_array
>
> This proposes adding one function: `preg_replace_callback_array()` th
17 matches
Mail list logo
