I don't think we should add it purely for consistency, because then we'd
have to allow nonsense like:
switch x;
case 1;
endcase;
endswitch;
or...
try;
x;
catch e;
endtry;
Sure, consistency is good, but this would allow sloppy code.
On Jul 20, 2012 8:36 AM, "Amaury Bouchard" wrote:
> 2012/7/19
2012/7/19 Reeze
> 在 2012年7月19日星期四，下午6:45，Rune Kaagaard 写道：
>
> > +1 for the consistency of it. It's surprising that:
> >
> > if ($foo)
> > return $bar;
> > else
> > return 42;
> >
> > works and:
> >
> > try
> > maybe_dangerous();
> > catch(Dynamite $e)
> > handle_error();
> >
> >
>
> Ther
Hi，
在 2012年7月19日星期四，下午6:45，Rune Kaagaard 写道：
> +1 for the consistency of it. It's surprising that:
>
> if ($foo)
> return $bar;
> else
> return 42;
>
> works and:
>
> try
> maybe_dangerous();
> catch(Dynamite $e)
> handle_error();
>
>
There is no condition after `try`, it's really har
