On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, at 08:45, Rob Landers wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, at 01:11, Benjamin Morel wrote:
>>> The answer is: it depends. If you don’t need the array to clean up after
>>> itself, you can indeed use an array of WeakReference to get most of the way
>>> there. If you want it t
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, at 01:11, Benjamin Morel wrote:
>> The answer is: it depends. If you don’t need the array to clean up after
>> itself, you can indeed use an array of WeakReference to get most of the way
>> there. If you want it to clean up after an object gets removed, you either
>> need
>
> The answer is: it depends. If you don’t need the array to clean up after
> itself, you can indeed use an array of WeakReference to get most of the way
> there. If you want it to clean up after an object gets removed, you either
> need to add support to the stored object’s destructor (which isn’
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024, at 19:48, Gina P. Banyard wrote:
> On Wednesday, 10 July 2024 at 18:34, Rob Landers wrote:
>> Hello internals,
>>
>> I know now that some of you are swamped getting ready for 8.4, so I want to
>> be clear that this will be an 8.5+ thing. I am simply sending it to the list
On Wednesday, 10 July 2024 at 18:34, Rob Landers wrote:
> Hello internals,
>
> I know now that some of you are swamped getting ready for 8.4, so I want to
> be clear that this will be an 8.5+ thing. I am simply sending it to the list
> in case anyone wants to discuss it, burn it with fire, give
Hello internals,
I know now that some of you are swamped getting ready for 8.4, so I want to be
clear that this will be an 8.5+ thing. I am simply sending it to the list in
case anyone wants to discuss it, burn it with fire, give it a gold star, or
ignore until later.
Currently, a WeakMap may
