On Tue, 29 May 2012 02:28:05 +0200, Stas Malyshev
wrote:
This looks very complicated. It might be that some use cases require
this level of complexity, but I can't remember a case where I would need
it. That alone does not disqualify the proposal, but I personally very
much like having someth
Hi!
> I've opened the array_part() vote:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_part#vote
>
> The vote asks whether the branch at
> https://github.com/cataphract/php-src/tree/array_part should be merged.
> This implementation has been tested and has 100% code coverage on the
> reachable code.
I've opened the array_part() vote:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_part#vote
The vote asks whether the branch at
https://github.com/cataphract/php-src/tree/array_part should be merged.
This implementation has been tested and has 100% code coverage on the
reachable code.
--
Gustavo Lopes
