Le 15/03/2015 16:46, Nikita Popov a écrit :
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote
Voting is open for ten days :)
Hi,
We talked about this RFC with other people at AFUP, and it seems we are
on the +1 side.
Basically, with "strict" warnings, one might wonder whether or not his
cod
On 16/03/2015 13:28, Markus Fischer wrote:
am I correct assuming that your existing test suite was running with
E_STRICT excluded from error_reporting ?
Of course.
Cheers
--
Matteo Beccati
Development & Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing
Hi Matteo,
On 16.03.15 12:43, Matteo Beccati wrote:
> On 15/03/2015 19:30, Matteo Beccati wrote:
>> In PHP4 times it was in fact quite common to change inherited method
>> signatures to bend them to one's will and/or remove parameters and
>> hardcode them in the parent constructor call. We now kno
Hi Nikic,
On 15/03/2015 19:30, Matteo Beccati wrote:
In PHP4 times it was in fact quite common to change inherited method
signatures to bend them to one's will and/or remove parameters and
hardcode them in the parent constructor call. We now know it is bad
practice, but I bet there's lot of code
On 15 March 2015 at 15:46, Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals!
>
> To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes...
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote
>
> Voting is open for ten days :)
>
Nikita, don't forget to start a new thread with the tag [VOTE] in the
subject line a
Hello Pierre,
Am 16.03.2015 um 02:34 schrieb Pierre Joye:
> "Some of the strict standards notices are converted to an error
> category that is considered more severe. As such error handlers might
> treat it more severely, resulting in BC breakage."
>
> Does it mean that some errors may end on rec
hi Nikita,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals!
>
> To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes...
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote
>
> Voting is open for ten days :)
I am late on that but I need one clarification about:
"Some of the s
Hi Nikita,
On 15/03/2015 16:46, Nikita Popov wrote:
Hi internals!
To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes...
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote
Voting is open for ten days :)
I know I'm late, but with I just have found the required time to test
the branch with my
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Markus Fischer wrote:
> On 15.03.15 16:46, Nikita Popov wrote:
> > To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes...
> >
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote
> >
> > Voting is open for ten days :)
>
> From the RFC:
>
> "Signature mismatch duri
On 15.03.15 16:46, Nikita Popov wrote:
> To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes...
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote
>
> Voting is open for ten days :)
>From the RFC:
"Signature mismatch during inheritance
...
Possible alternative: Convert to E_DEPRECATED, if we
Hi internals!
To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes...
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote
Voting is open for ten days :)
Thanks,
Nikita
11 matches
Mail list logo