On Sat, May 30, 2020, 18:20 tyson andre wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> > The naming is extremely wonky: allow_cache to allow_optimization? 🤔
> > Nonetheless, this is extremely valuable for widely used binaries and
> long running processes, so 👍
>
> I'm not fully clear on what you mean for opcache.allow_o
Hi Marco,
> The naming is extremely wonky: allow_cache to allow_optimization? 🤔
> Nonetheless, this is extremely valuable for widely used binaries and long
> running processes, so 👍
I'm not fully clear on what you mean for opcache.allow_optimization to do -
you'd have to combine it with changes
Hey Tyson,
The naming is extremely wonky: allow_cache to allow_optimization? 🤔
Nonetheless, this is extremely valuable for widely used binaries and long
running processes, so 👍
On Sat, May 30, 2020, 17:55 tyson andre wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I have opened the voting for https://wiki.php.net/
Hi internals,
I have opened the voting for https://wiki.php.net/rfc/opcache.no_cache
The proposal is to make the opcode optimizer and JIT available without opcode
caching, through a new setting opcache.allow_cache.
The voting period ends on 2020-06-13.
Thanks,
- Tyson
--
PHP Internals - PHP Ru