Le 02/02/2015 13:06, Andrea Faulds a écrit :
The RFC, which contains the voting widget, can be found here:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/combined-comparison-operator
Thanks!
Hi,
Discussing this RFC with other people of AFUP, we would be +1.
Basically: adding such an operator would make things muc
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> I personally would use spaceship operator often, but only if PHP had
>> operator overloading for classes. So I hope it will pass and operator
>
> PHP has operator overloading for classes, but just for internal ones.
> See: https
Hi!
> I personally would use spaceship operator often, but only if PHP had
> operator overloading for classes. So I hope it will pass and operator
PHP has operator overloading for classes, but just for internal ones.
See: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/operator_overloading_gmp
For userspace ones, the
Hello,
I personally would use spaceship operator often, but only if PHP had
operator overloading for classes. So I hope it will pass and operator
overloading will pass someday as well (but operator overloading would
probably require method overloading first and that's a thing you guys
oppose, righ
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
>> Since it's been two weeks and there are no remaining issues (aside from the
>> lack of a language specification patch - but that can be done later), I'm
>> opening voting on this RFC.
>
> I just noticed that you kept T_SPACESHIP; while tha
> Since it's been two weeks and there are no remaining issues (aside from the
> lack of a language specification patch - but that can be done later), I'm
> opening voting on this RFC.
I just noticed that you kept T_SPACESHIP; while that is fun I don't
think it is appropriate. It is a common name
Hey Nikita,
> On 2 Feb 2015, at 16:32, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Hey Nikita,
>
> > On 2 Feb 2015, at 13:49, Nikita Popov wrote:
> >
> > I've voted -1 because I think this should be a function and not an
> > operator. compare($a, $b) is mor
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Hey Nikita,
>
> > On 2 Feb 2015, at 13:49, Nikita Popov wrote:
> >
> > I've voted -1 because I think this should be a function and not an
> operator. compare($a, $b) is more obvious than $a <=> $b and it's not like
> writing comparison funct
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Hey Nikita,
>
>> On 2 Feb 2015, at 13:49, Nikita Popov wrote:
>>
>> I've voted -1 because I think this should be a function and not an operator.
>> compare($a, $b) is more obvious than $a <=> $b and it's not like writing
>> comparison funct
Hey Nikita,
> On 2 Feb 2015, at 13:49, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> I've voted -1 because I think this should be a function and not an operator.
> compare($a, $b) is more obvious than $a <=> $b and it's not like writing
> comparison functions is such a super common use case that it needs the extra
On 02.02.15 14:49, Nikita Popov wrote:
> I've voted -1 because I think this should be a function and not an
> operator. compare($a, $b) is more obvious than $a <=> $b and it's not like
> writing comparison functions is such a super common use case that it needs
> the extra brevity of an operator. A
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Since it's been two weeks and there are no remaining issues (aside from
> the lack of a language specification patch - but that can be done later),
> I'm opening voting on this RFC.
>
> Voting starts today (2015-02-02) and en
Hi everyone,
Since it's been two weeks and there are no remaining issues (aside from the
lack of a language specification patch - but that can be done later), I'm
opening voting on this RFC.
Voting starts today (2015-02-02) and ends in two weeks' time (2015-02-16). As
this adds to the PHP lang
13 matches
Mail list logo
