On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Stas Malyshev
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Stas Malyshev
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Nobody runs PHP with -n, who would you do that? INIs are the r
Hi:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 05:31:05PM -0700, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> On 7/17/11 3:03 PM, Richard Quadling wrote:
>
> >My local ini file is 6 lines long. Works perfectly.
>
> And you rely on magic_quotes being on, right? Then you have peculiar
> definition of "working perfectly".
Let's not pick
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Stas Malyshev
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Nobody runs PHP with -n, who would you do that? INIs are the recommended
> >> setting, if you ignore that, you do it at your ow
hi,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
> Currently working really only encompasses running PhD on Windows (new
> setup for the new home laptop).
>
> But, in essence, the inability to rely on one default setting
> inescapably leads to the inability to rely on any of the def
On 18 July 2011 01:31, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 7/17/11 3:03 PM, Richard Quadling wrote:
>>
>> Why bother having defaults if you don't use them.
>
> Err, well, the way PHP ini system works you always have defaults - something
> is always stored in the hash.
>
>> My local ini file is 6 lin
Hi!
On 7/17/11 6:32 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
there been a proper discussion or RFC on this topic for 5.4. The vote
was premature. Would it have turned out differently had we done it
properly? Probably, but at least we'd have a proper reference point
for why we removed a security feature that was
On Jul 17, 2011, at 5:56 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 7/17/11 5:46 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
>>> And you rely on magic_quotes being on, right? Then you have peculiar
>>> definition of "working perfectly".
>>
>> Nobody here said they rely on magic quotes, and that is not related to what
Hi!
On 7/17/11 5:46 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
And you rely on magic_quotes being on, right? Then you have peculiar definition of
"working perfectly".
Nobody here said they rely on magic quotes, and that is not related to what a
default value means,
or how they are handled.
We're discussing m
On Jul 17, 2011, at 5:31 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 7/17/11 3:03 PM, Richard Quadling wrote:
>> Why bother having defaults if you don't use them.
>
> Err, well, the way PHP ini system works you always have defaults - something
> is always stored in the hash.
His point was that you
Hi!
On 7/17/11 5:35 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
Stas, could we change the default value?
pretty please?
We could, but what's the point if we're removing it altogether?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runti
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 7/17/11 3:03 PM, Richard Quadling wrote:
>>
>> Why bother having defaults if you don't use them.
>
> Err, well, the way PHP ini system works you always have defaults - something
> is always stored in the hash.
>
>> My local ini fil
Hi!
On 7/17/11 3:03 PM, Richard Quadling wrote:
Why bother having defaults if you don't use them.
Err, well, the way PHP ini system works you always have defaults -
something is always stored in the hash.
My local ini file is 6 lines long. Works perfectly.
And you rely on magic_quotes be
On 17 July 2011 02:04, Daniel Convissor
wrote:
>
> Hi Stas:
>
> > Nobody runs PHP with -n, who would you do that? INIs are the
> > recommended setting, if you ignore that, you do it at your own
> > peril.
>
> I've seen many servers that run with php.ini files that have only a few
> lines in them,
Hi Stas:
> Nobody runs PHP with -n, who would you do that? INIs are the
> recommended setting, if you ignore that, you do it at your own
> peril.
I've seen many servers that run with php.ini files that have only a few
lines in them, relying on the defaults for most of the behavior.
--Dan
--
T
Maybe it could be implemented as a PECL package and then on a future version
added to the core of PHP?
2011/7/14 Hannes Landeholm
> Okay, maybe it could be attempted to be squeezed in anyway to 5.4? I really
> need this feature and apparently others feel the same way.
>
> - It would benefit MVC
On 07/14/2011 11:43 AM, Hannes Landeholm wrote:
Okay, maybe it could be attempted to be squeezed in anyway to 5.4? I really
need this feature and apparently others feel the same way.
- It would benefit MVC framework design - one of the most common design
pattern for web development.
- The tick
Hi!
On 7/14/11 11:43 AM, Hannes Landeholm wrote:
Okay, maybe it could be attempted to be squeezed in anyway to 5.4? I
really need this feature and apparently others feel the same way.
We don't even have an RFC on it, let alone consensus & implementation,
and we'd have a beta in a little more
Okay, maybe it could be attempted to be squeezed in anyway to 5.4? I really
need this feature and apparently others feel the same way.
- It would benefit MVC framework design - one of the most common design
pattern for web development.
- The ticket has been open for over a year now and it has a lo
Hi!
On 7/14/11 8:50 AM, Hannes Landeholm wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to add Weak References to this todo list?
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52318
Probably not for 5.4.0. This looks like a thing that needs an RFC and
discussion (and implementation of course ;).
--
Stanislav Malyshev, So
Hello,
Is it possible to add Weak References to this todo list?
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52318
I've been waiting over a year now for this feature. It's a critical part of
object relational layer mapping and my framework will be broken until it
exists. One of our important customer projects
Great responses, all of them.
Thanks everybody for the insight.
Apologies if I veered off topic.
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald [mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 2:56 PM
To: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] 5.4 features vote
Am
Am 13.07.2011 21:50, schrieb Moshe, Sam:
> What's so wrong with magic quotes that they need to be removed from the
> language entirely?
they are idiotic because useless for escaping database inputs
and you need to find out this setting to remove them by
stripslashes() if enabled from some dumb adm
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Moshe, Sam wrote:
> I'm sure this has been discussed, but I'm new here, and uncertain as to
> where to go to get caught up.
> What's so wrong with magic quotes that they need to be removed from the
> language entirely?
>
> Links of advice would be helpful.
> Thanks
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 7/13/11 12:28 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>>
>> I do in many situations while testing and debugging and that's why the
>> default values exist.
>
> Can't we keep it on topic? Do you need magic quotes when you're debugging?
> Do you expe
[mailto:smalys...@sugarcrm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 2:40 PM
To: Pierre Joye
Cc: Ferenc Kovacs; Philip Olson; PHP Internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] 5.4 features vote
Hi!
On 7/13/11 12:28 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> I do in many situations while testing and debugging and that&#x
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On 7/13/11 11:35 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>>
>>> tyrael@thor:~/checkouts$ php -n -r 'echo PHP_VERSION."\n";echo
>>> ini_get("magic_quotes_gpc")."\n";'
>>> 5.3.6-6~dotdeb.1
>>>
Hi!
On 7/13/11 12:28 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
I do in many situations while testing and debugging and that's why the
default values exist.
Can't we keep it on topic? Do you need magic quotes when you're
debugging? Do you expect it to have the same value with and without -n?
Does your code rely
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 7/13/11 11:35 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> tyrael@thor:~/checkouts$ php -n -r 'echo PHP_VERSION."\n";echo
>> ini_get("magic_quotes_gpc")."\n";'
>> 5.3.6-6~dotdeb.1
>> 1
>
> Nobody runs PHP with -n, who would you do that? INIs are
Hi!
On 7/13/11 11:35 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
tyrael@thor:~/checkouts$ php -n -r 'echo PHP_VERSION."\n";echo
ini_get("magic_quotes_gpc")."\n";'
5.3.6-6~dotdeb.1
1
Nobody runs PHP with -n, who would you do that? INIs are the recommended
setting, if you ignore that, you do it at your own peril.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 7/13/11 11:11 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> I would also change my vote, I would go with keeping it deprecated,
>> but turning it off by default (currently it isn't done, but the
>> suggested development/production inis have this
Hi!
On 7/13/11 11:11 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
I would also change my vote, I would go with keeping it deprecated,
but turning it off by default (currently it isn't done, but the
suggested development/production inis have this turned off), and
remove it with the next minor version bump.
Which b
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 7/13/11 8:55 AM, Philip Olson wrote:
>>
>> But this topic (removing magic quotes from 5.4) was not proposed on
>> this list, so the vote feels premature. The only related RFC on the
>> matter involves PHP 6, and it isn't specific t
Hi!
On 7/13/11 8:55 AM, Philip Olson wrote:
But this topic (removing magic quotes from 5.4) was not proposed on
this list, so the vote feels premature. The only related RFC on the
matter involves PHP 6, and it isn't specific to MQ. Granted we all
don't like MQ, but this "security" feature is ena
On Jul 11, 2011, at 5:20 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 7/11/11 5:09 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
>> this previously accepted RFC is not about removing magic quotes. And I'm the
>> author of said RFC. It deals with PHP 5.3 which removed get_magic_quotes_*()
>> so this old RFC restored them int
Hi!
On 7/11/11 5:09 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
this previously accepted RFC is not about removing magic quotes. And I'm the
author of said RFC. It deals with PHP 5.3 which removed get_magic_quotes_*()
so this old RFC restored them into both PHP 5.3+ and PHP 6.
Yes, it's not exactly what is being
On Jul 8, 2011, at 11:30 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've created a voting page for the features in 5.4 TODO list for which we
> need to find consensus. Please go there:
> https://wiki.php.net/todo/php54/vote
> and vote!
>
> See also links to relevant RFCs on the TODO page:
> https://w
Hi:
okey,
I have updated the vote wiki page.
thanks
2011/7/11 Stas Malyshev :
> Hi!
>
> On 7/9/11 6:47 AM, Laruence wrote:
>>
>> Hi:
>>
>> can we add "Foreach supporting T_LIST token" into this vote?
>>
>> RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/foreachlist
>
> If the author thinks it's mature enough h
Hi!
On 7/9/11 6:47 AM, Laruence wrote:
Hi:
can we add "Foreach supporting T_LIST token" into this vote?
RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/foreachlist
If the author thinks it's mature enough he can put it up to the vote.
One aspect I see that is not covered is if the references would work in
Hi!
On 7/9/11 10:03 AM, Lars Strojny wrote:
Hi Stas,
Do you feel this is the somewhat final list for 5.4 or is will there be
some room for new RFCs (I¹m thinking of Annotations, were an updated RFC
was promised).
My feeling is annotations is better to wait till next version, it's
pretty big
Hi Stas,
Do you feel this is the somewhat final list for 5.4 or is will there be
some room for new RFCs (I¹m thinking of Annotations, were an updated RFC
was promised).
With regards,
Lars
Am 09.07.11 08:30 schrieb "Stas Malyshev" unter :
>Hi!
>
>I've created a voting page for the features in 5.
Hi:
can we add "Foreach supporting T_LIST token" into this vote?
RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/foreachlist
thanks
2011/7/9 Stas Malyshev :
> Hi!
>
> I've created a voting page for the features in 5.4 TODO list for which we
> need to find consensus. Please go there:
> https://wiki.php.net/todo
Hi!
I've created a voting page for the features in 5.4 TODO list for which
we need to find consensus. Please go there:
https://wiki.php.net/todo/php54/vote
and vote!
See also links to relevant RFCs on the TODO page:
https://wiki.php.net/todo/php54
If something is unclear or you notice a mist
43 matches
Mail list logo
