On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 1:25 PM G. P. B. wrote:
> I'm all for it however isn't a 2/3 majority required for all RFCs now?
>
> Oh, indeed. Hadn't noticed that get voted on. Neat! Have updated RFC to
reflect. Thanks!
You're listing libsodium versions 0.15 and 0.13 there, but it should
be 1.0.15 and 1.0.13.
Maybe for everyone's reference: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS comes with no
libargon2, and with libsodium 1.0.8; 18.04 LTS comes with libargon2
and with libsodium 1.0.16.
Debian Stretch has 1.0.11, and 1.0.17 in backpor
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 19:52, Sara Golemon wrote:
> I was originally planning to just do this since I thought it'd be
> non-controversial, but while implementing I discovered some gotchas, so I'm
> putting it to the group for discussion. Please give attention to the
> "Backward Incompatible Chang
I was originally planning to just do this since I thought it'd be
non-controversial, but while implementing I discovered some gotchas, so I'm
putting it to the group for discussion. Please give attention to the
"Backward Incompatible Changes" section.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/sodium.argon.hash
-
