> On 11 Jan 2015, at 02:26, Juan Basso wrote:
>
> I renamed the constant name on the RFC. Can I open the voting?
Hey Juan,
It’s been long enough, and the constant name is a minor issue. Go for it.
:)
--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
I renamed the constant name on the RFC. Can I open the voting?
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Juan Basso wrote:
> I really like the new name and the consistence with the rest of php. If no
> one else has a complain about it I will update the RFC and open for voting,
> right?
>
> Juan Basso
> On
I really like the new name and the consistence with the rest of php. If no
one else has a complain about it I will update the RFC and open for voting,
right?
Juan Basso
On Jan 5, 2015 7:31 AM, "Ferenc Kovacs" wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Juan Basso wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Everyone
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Juan Basso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Everyone has any concern on the constant name as Andrea mentioned? Should
> we keep or rename it? If this name is fine and there is no other concerns
> probably in 3 days (when completes 2 weeks) this RFC can be moved to
> voting, right?
Hi,
Everyone has any concern on the constant name as Andrea mentioned? Should
we keep or rename it? If this name is fine and there is no other concerns
probably in 3 days (when completes 2 weeks) this RFC can be moved to
voting, right?
Thanks,
Juan Basso
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Juan Ba
Andrea,
I am not a specialist in float numbers, but I think integral float numbers
have a fractional part with value 0.
JSON_FLOAT_ADD_POINT_ZERO can be confuse for regular floats with non-zero
as fractional part. Seems you are going to add a point zero in a regular
float with point something.
A
> On 25 Dec 2014, at 19:32, Juan Basso wrote:
>
> The RFC can be found here:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/json_preserve_fractional_part
Hey Juan,
A further thought: is “Preserve Fractional Part” the best name? Integral floats
like float(12) don’t have any fractional part, and besides, the name
Exactly. The idea of this RFC is just to add as a new option and not
enabled by default.
The idea to enable it by default was discussed before and I just added as
future scope since it is not an easy decision, especially because the
backward compatibility. The main goal is to have the option to ch
Hi!
> Good evening and merry christmas,
>
> After some discussion in a separated thread I created the RFC to discuss
> about the implementation of another json_encode option.
>
> The RFC can be found here:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/json_preserve_fractional_part
Completely makes sense for me as
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> > On 25 Dec 2014, at 19:32, Juan Basso wrote:
> >
> > Good evening and merry christmas,
> >
> > After some discussion in a separated thread I created the RFC to discuss
> > about the implementation of another json_encode option.
> >
> > T
> On 25 Dec 2014, at 19:32, Juan Basso wrote:
>
> Good evening and merry christmas,
>
> After some discussion in a separated thread I created the RFC to discuss
> about the implementation of another json_encode option.
>
> The RFC can be found here:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/json_preserve_fra
Good evening and merry christmas,
After some discussion in a separated thread I created the RFC to discuss
about the implementation of another json_encode option.
The RFC can be found here:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/json_preserve_fractional_part
Juan Basso
12 matches
Mail list logo
