Original Message-
> From: Benjamin Eberlei [mailto:kont...@beberlei.de]
> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 3:08 AM
> To: internals@lists.php.net; r.borsc...@gmx.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Performance improvements
>
>
> We wanted to share some of our insights on the pe
We wanted to share some of our insights on the performance patches.
Roman did some tests on the Doctrine 2 performance testsuite to check the
benefits of
the performance improvements and they are pretty impressive (Thanks
Dimitry!).
Our performance testsuite containts pretty intense and h
Jordi Boggiano wrote:
On 20.04.2010 12:41, Derick Rethans wrote:
You're writing that the ZEND_CATCH opcode has to be used with a constant
class name, so how would "catch ( self $e )" be represented in op-codes now?
I dropped such possibility. Does someone use it?
For me it looks useless. If i
On 20.04.2010 12:41, Derick Rethans wrote:
>>> You're writing that the ZEND_CATCH opcode has to be used with a constant
>>> class name, so how would "catch ( self $e )" be represented in op-codes now?
>>
>> I dropped such possibility. Does someone use it?
>> For me it looks useless. If it's really
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Derick Rethans wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> >
> > > I've published all the patches, their description and performance
> > > evaluation
> > > at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/performanceimprovements
> >
> > I've a few questions and c
Hi Derick,
Thank you for review.
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
I've published all the patches, their description and performance evaluation
at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/performanceimprovements
I've a few questions and comments:
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/perfor
Am 20.04.2010 09:21, schrieb Derick Rethans:
> You're writing that the ZEND_CATCH opcode has to be used with a constant
> class name, so how would "catch ( self $e )" be represented in op-codes
> now?
Is self not replaced with the class name at compile time? And why would
you write such code?
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> I've published all the patches, their description and performance evaluation
> at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/performanceimprovements
I've a few questions and comments:
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/performanceimprovements#zend_engine_vm_tuning
You're writing t
Hi Christopher,
Christopher Jones wrote:
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've added the corresponding patch for APC, so anyone is able to verify
> the performance difference.
>
> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/performanceimprovements
Dmitry,
What do you think caused the "fw" difference in abso
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've added the corresponding patch for APC, so anyone is able to verify
> the performance difference.
>
> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/performanceimprovements
Dmitry,
What do you think caused the "fw" difference in absolute figures
between the APC and Zend Optimizer+
Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
Hi Dmitry
2010/4/19 Dmitry Stogov :
Hi,
I've added the corresponding patch for APC, so anyone is able to verify the
performance difference.
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/performanceimprovements
Thanks. Dmitry.
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
In the patched config.w32, you wro
Hi Dmitry
2010/4/19 Dmitry Stogov :
> Hi,
>
> I've added the corresponding patch for APC, so anyone is able to verify the
> performance difference.
>
> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/performanceimprovements
>
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>
> Dmitry Stogov wrote:
In the patched config.w32, you wrote zend_string.c,
Hi,
I've added the corresponding patch for APC, so anyone is able to verify
the performance difference.
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/performanceimprovements
Thanks. Dmitry.
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi,
I've published all the patches, their description and performance
evaluation at http://wiki.php.
Hi Kalle,
Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
Hi
2010/4/13 Dmitry Stogov :
Hi,
I've published all the patches, their description and performance evaluation
at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/performanceimprovements
The only thing I notice while browsing the patches was that you need
to add the zend_string.
com]
Sent: 13 April 2010 14:53
To: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Performance improvements
Hi,
I've published all the patches, their description and
performance evaluation at
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/performanceimprovements
In two words the patches give 0-20% improvemen
Hi Richard,
Richard Quadling wrote:
On 13 April 2010 14:53, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi,
I've published all the patches, their description and performance evaluation
at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/performanceimprovements
In two words the patches give 0-20% improvement even on real-life
applications.
Hi
2010/4/13 Dmitry Stogov :
> Hi,
>
> I've published all the patches, their description and performance evaluation
> at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/performanceimprovements
The only thing I notice while browsing the patches was that you need
to add the zend_string.c and other new files to win32/build
igbinary could be patched to take advantage of
string interning?
-Jared
> -Original Message-
> From: Dmitry Stogov [mailto:dmi...@zend.com]
> Sent: 13 April 2010 14:53
> To: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Performance improvements
>
> Hi,
>
Hi,
I've published all the patches, their description and performance
evaluation at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/performanceimprovements
In two words the patches give 0-20% improvement even on real-life
applications.
I'm going to commit them into trunk in a week in case of no objections.
Of cou
19 matches
Mail list logo
