Well the history simply is that many people did not agree. And you simply
For any decision there would be many people that disagree. But we have
to end is somewhere and not rehash it endlessly.
are unhappy with the current state, so either convince them with technical
arguments or change the
Hello Stanislav,
Sunday, March 23, 2008, 2:51:30 AM, you wrote:
>> Since multiple namespaces are allowed in the same file we have no
>> choice but to use this syntax.
> Yes we have choice. Leave it as it is and stop raising this topic every
> two weeks.
Well the history simply is that many peo
Since multiple namespaces are allowed in the same file we have no
choice but to use this syntax.
Yes we have choice. Leave it as it is and stop raising this topic every
two weeks.
My hero :)
- Steph
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
(40
Since multiple namespaces are allowed in the same file we have no
choice but to use this syntax.
Yes we have choice. Leave it as it is and stop raising this topic every
two weeks.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
(408)253-8829 MSN: [EMAI
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Internals,
>
> we all were asked to stop discussing syntax of namespaces as we were told
> that we would decide after the namespace functionality was fully implemented.
> Now I think that the functionallity is p
Hello Internals,
we all were asked to stop discussing syntax of namespaces as we were told
that we would decide after the namespace functionality was fully implemented.
Now I think that the functionallity is pretty much settled we should
revisit the syntax. We all have been very patient so far.
