Hi,
Ferenc nailed why this RFC could be considered invalid. Maintenance burden
and separate releases would be bad if tied to php-src. I'll update its
status to declined.
Joe, as I said in the RFC, Mutex could only be supported through pthreads
PECL.
So your answer was still not 100% accurate from
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 14:26 +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>> .
>> personally I think that a pecl extension needs to have stronger arguments
>> to be bundled with php-src than the fact that it would probably create a
>> bit more exposure for
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 14:26 +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> .
> personally I think that a pecl extension needs to have stronger arguments
> to be bundled with php-src than the fact that it would probably create a
> bit more exposure for the ext.
>
Fully agree and mind this:
For an average user it
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 14:26 +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:18 PM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com <
> guilhermebla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > What does that even mean?
> >
> > It means that any new functionality that gets into core could be considered
> > "young". Like when P
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:18 PM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com <
guilhermebla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What does that even mean?
>
> It means that any new functionality that gets into core could be considered
> "young". Like when PHAR got introduced, it was a "young" extension. Same
> for PDO, same f
> What does that even mean?
It means that any new functionality that gets into core could be considered
"young". Like when PHAR got introduced, it was a "young" extension. Same
for PDO, same for FileInfo...
What I'm trying to highlight is that being a recently coded extension or
not, it's not a go
On 30 Sep 2014, at 20:56, guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Isn't this extension a bit "young" to join php core ?
>
> I agree. However, there's no equivalent existing support in PHP atm.
That, in itself, is not necessarily a justification. Unless an awful lot of PHP
users need this, it shoul
> Fix the title? :) Is it for sync or pecl_http?
Someone already fixed that.
> Isn't this extension a bit "young" to join php core ?
I agree. However, there's no equivalent existing support in PHP atm.
Also, any new functionality introduced to PHP would always be new, young
and caring maturity.
This needs a "Why" section.
Why is this good for PHP?
Why will a significant percentage of users be interested in this?
Why is it necessary?
This feel pretty niche to me.
-Sara
> On Sep 30, 2014, at 4:06, "guilhermebla...@gmail.com"
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is a new RFC: https://wiki.php.n
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 30/09/2014 05:06, guilhermebla...@gmail.com a écrit :
> >
> > Here is a new RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/sync
>
> Isn't this extension a bit "young" to join php core ?
I'd say both that, and that the RFC is *very* minimal. THere is no
rationale why
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Leigh wrote:
> On 30 September 2014 04:06, guilhermebla...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is a new RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/sync
>>
>> Thoughts appreciated.
>>
>
> What are the actual benefits of this being included in core? The RFC
> doesn't really lis
On 30 September 2014 04:06, guilhermebla...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a new RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/sync
>
> Thoughts appreciated.
>
What are the actual benefits of this being included in core? The RFC
doesn't really list any.
Also, there was a discussion in June (started by Julie
On 9/29/2014 8:06 PM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Here is a new RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/sync
Thoughts appreciated.
Cheers,
As the original author of this extension, I only have a few caveats to
point out:
1) It has a dependency on POSIX semaphores on non-Windows platforms.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 30/09/2014 05:06, guilhermebla...@gmail.com a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Here is a new RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/sync
Isn't this extension a bit "young" to join php core ?
Remi.
>
> Thoughts appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
The title is wrong.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:06 AM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a new RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/sync
>
> Thoughts appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Guilherme Blanco
> MSN: guilhermebla...@hotmail.com
> GTalk: guilhermeblanco
> Toronto - ON/Canada
--
Hi,
Here is a new RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/sync
Thoughts appreciated.
Cheers,
--
Guilherme Blanco
MSN: guilhermebla...@hotmail.com
GTalk: guilhermeblanco
Toronto - ON/Canada
16 matches
Mail list logo
