> It should contain the consolidated unified policy documentation that is
> "currently" active.
> The other option is what we currently have, and I am proposing to go
> away from. So the idea is that this repository is not a
> collection of the accepted policy *amendments* (or *replacements*),
> a
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Jorg Sowa wrote:
> I have one question regarding the future changes. Do you see it would
> be possible to make amendment to the accepted RFCs by the Pull
> Requests (and formal RFC approach) making changes the existing
> policies or adding the new policy replacing the old o
Hey Derick,
Thank you for proposing this change. As a author of comment you mentioned I
believe this will help new maintainers to get all the information about the
RFC process from one place.
I have one question regarding the future changes. Do you see it would be
possible to make amendment to the
Hi,
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, Derick Rethans wrote:
> A while ago I started looking into all the documents (RFCs etc) that we
> have that relate to all sort of policies. From RFCs, to who can vote,
> naming, and security classifications as a result of a discussion with
> the foundations folk.
A hea
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023, at 11:06 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > A while ago I started looking into all the documents (RFCs etc) that we
> > have that relate to all sort of policies. From RFCs, to who can vote,
> > naming, and security classific
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023, at 11:06 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> Hi!
>
> A while ago I started looking into all the documents (RFCs etc) that we
> have that relate to all sort of policies. From RFCs, to who can vote,
> naming, and security classifications as a result of a discussion with
> the foundati
Hi!
A while ago I started looking into all the documents (RFCs etc) that we
have that relate to all sort of policies. From RFCs, to who can vote,
naming, and security classifications as a result of a discussion with
the foundations folk.
Now there was another small confusion during a recent vo
