Hello Alexey,
my last update on this was that people were unhappy with closures. If
that is not the case than maybe we need to write this as an RFC on the
wiki: http://wiki.php.net/rfc
So well maybe you're right and it only requires selecting between the two
and checking whether there are tiny
On 3/23/08, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Ryusuke,
>
> I have put your proposal as a link to a PHP GSoC 2008 idea here:
> http://wiki.php.net/gsoc/2008
>
> Feel invited to add to this idea in whatever way you want :-)
how is it related to gsoc?
patches are already there — a
Hello Ryusuke,
I have put your proposal as a link to a PHP GSoC 2008 idea here:
http://wiki.php.net/gsoc/2008
Feel invited to add to this idea in whatever way you want :-)
marcus
Saturday, February 23, 2008, 7:46:34 PM, you wrote:
> 2008/2/24, Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Do we hav
always unique behaviors of our language and environment which require a
> fresh view at things.
> Andi
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andrei Zmievski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 10:00 AM
>> To: Matvey Arye
>> Cc: KOYAMA Tets
Whichever one the newly developed features are going into these days.
Seems to be 5.3 or 5.4.
-Andrei
On Feb 24, 2008, at 4:03 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
To be clear, my statement was about the closures and not sexier
anonymous functions. I agree that we need to do an RFC on this
Hi!
To be clear, my statement was about the closures and not sexier
anonymous functions. I agree that we need to do an RFC on this matter.
I'm curious - for which PHP version all these things are targeted?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
To be clear, my statement was about the closures and not sexier
anonymous functions. I agree that we need to do an RFC on this matter.
-Andrei
On Feb 23, 2008, at 8:36 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I think we have to be very clear whether we are going to provide
just a
sexier notation for anonym
iew at things.
Andi
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrei Zmievski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 10:00 AM
> To: Matvey Arye
> Cc: KOYAMA Tetsuji; internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Anonymous functions
>
> Yes, let's re-o
2008/2/24, Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Do we have a working patch somewhere then?
Hi, I have added support for closures to my patches.
http://www.opendogs.org/pub/php-5.3-080223-anon.patch
http://www.opendogs.org/pub/php-6.0-080223-anon.patch
http://www.opendogs.org/pub/php-anon-tests-
Am 23.02.2008 um 17:13 schrieb Pierre Joye:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Do we have a working patch somewhere then?
Did we not get one from Wez? and an alternative from remember> :)
http://news.php.net/php.internals/34216
I think the last ver
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do we have a working patch somewhere then?
Did we not get one from Wez? and an alternative from :)
--
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To u
Do we have a working patch somewhere then?
-Andrei
On Feb 23, 2008, at 12:43 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Andrei,
+1
Friday, February 22, 2008, 7:00:11 PM, you wrote:
Yes, let's re-open, I'd like to get a closure on that issue (pun
intended).
-Andrei
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runt
Hi Andrei,
Am Freitag, den 22.02.2008, 10:00 -0800 schrieb Andrei Zmievski:
> Yes, let's re-open, I'd like to get a closure on that issue (pun
> intended).
+1. I would love it.
cu, Lars
--
Lars Strojny
Senior Software Developer Media Ventures GmbH (http://mediaventures.de)
signature.asc
De
And +1 from me :)
David
Am 23.02.2008 um 12:43 schrieb Marcus Boerger:
Hello Andrei,
+1
Friday, February 22, 2008, 7:00:11 PM, you wrote:
Yes, let's re-open, I'd like to get a closure on that issue (pun
intended).
-Andrei
On Feb 18, 2008, at 8:26 AM, Matvey Arye wrote:
Hi All,
Hello Andrei,
+1
Friday, February 22, 2008, 7:00:11 PM, you wrote:
> Yes, let's re-open, I'd like to get a closure on that issue (pun
> intended).
> -Andrei
> On Feb 18, 2008, at 8:26 AM, Matvey Arye wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I second this. Can we please re-open the discussion on anonymous
Yes, let's re-open, I'd like to get a closure on that issue (pun
intended).
-Andrei
On Feb 18, 2008, at 8:26 AM, Matvey Arye wrote:
Hi All,
I second this. Can we please re-open the discussion on anonymous
functions as well as closures. That would be an awesome feature.
create_function i
Hi All,
I second this. Can we please re-open the discussion on anonymous
functions as well as closures. That would be an awesome feature.
create_function is a bit ugly semantically to be sufficient for all
anonymous function needs.
Thanks,
Mat
KOYAMA Tetsuji wrote:
Hi lists,
Is this discu
Hi lists,
Is this discussion stopping?
I want this feature in PHP. Please start to talk.
On Jan 10, 2008 7:09 PM, Ryusuke SEKIYAMA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, lists,
>
> We have discussed about implementing anonymous functions and
> closures in PHP.
> However, I consider that implementin
On 10/01/2008, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Ryusuke,
>
> +1, looks pretty nice, makes my life easier in some cases and is closer to
> other languages like pythin so i can transfer concepts easily which is a
> big plus for me.
>
> marcus
>
> Thursday, January 10, 2008, 11:
Hello Ryusuke,
+1, looks pretty nice, makes my life easier in some cases and is closer to
other languages like pythin so i can transfer concepts easily which is a
big plus for me.
marcus
Thursday, January 10, 2008, 11:09:26 AM, you wrote:
> Hello, lists,
> We have discussed about impleme
Hello, lists,
We have discussed about implementing anonymous functions and
closures in PHP.
However, I consider that implementing anonymous functions and
implementing lexical scopes should be discussed separately.
# Even though I like closure. ;-)
So I wrote anonymous function patch for PHP 5.3 an
21 matches
Mail list logo
