> > Thumbs up for the idea as well, but I don't think we can live with the
> > implementation. BTW, that's a bit of a grey area but I think that
> > even if an idea is accepted, if there's no reasonably clean
> > implementation available for it, I don't think it can go in.
> >
> > Zeev
>
> As said
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Bob Weinand wrote:
> I have started the vote for extended keyword support RFC:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/keywords_as_identifiers
Just to explain why I voted "no". I think the idea is good, but what I
see from the patch is that it adds a *lot* of hand written state
machi
On 10/22/2013 11:30 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> I did not vote yet, however I agree with Derick. A cleaner solution
> would be better. We have lived with this restriction for some time
> already and we may as well delay this RFC until we have a viable
> technical solution. If anyone feels motivated en
