Hi!
> I see a LOT of "no" votes against this RFC but can't find the thread
> outlining the reasoning for such resistence.
I think my attempts to explain that this was a step towards named
params, not a contradiction with them, failed - people read it, say "we
understood it" and the say "no, we do
I see a LOT of "no" votes against this RFC but can't find the thread
outlining the reasoning for such resistence.
Could someone link me to this somehow?
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Pascal Martin, AFUP <
mail...@pascal-martin.fr> wrote:
> Le 08/02/2015 09:14, Stanislav Malyshev a écrit :
>
>
Le 08/02/2015 09:14, Stanislav Malyshev a écrit :
I'd like to announce a vote on parameter skipping RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/skipparams
Hi,
After discussing this RFC with other people at AFUP, we would be -1.
Basically, even though not having to specify the default-value for some
parame
Hi!
I'd like to announce a vote on parameter skipping RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/skipparams
TLDR: it allows using "default" to specify that parameter has the
default value when calling function with optional parameter, like this:
create_query("deleted=0", "name", default, /*report_errors*/ tru
