On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 6:46 PM Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>
> I would like to vote to "yes".
> However, RFC does not have benchmark result. Do you have some results?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Yasuo Ohgaki
> yohg...@ohgaki.net
>
Yasuo,
I have documented a benchmark based on my last comment. This benchmark
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 6:46 PM Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>
> I would like to vote to "yes".
> However, RFC does not have benchmark result. Do you have some results?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Yasuo Ohgaki
> yohg...@ohgaki.net
>
>
I have not run a benchmark on the current implementation but would be happy
t
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 5:26 AM Dustin Wheeler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've let this RFC linger for a long time and finally wrapped up the
> remaining administrative items to put it to vote. This has been
> discussed a few times in the past:
>
> https://externals.io/message/89732
> https://externals.i
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 12:09 PM Niklas Keller wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> could you please fix the creation date in the RFC? It lists
> 2018-06-27, which would mean that the minimum discussion period
> wouldn't be over, yet, but it's actually been created somewhen last
> year.
>
Ugh, sorry about that! In
Hey,
could you please fix the creation date in the RFC? It lists
2018-06-27, which would mean that the minimum discussion period
wouldn't be over, yet, but it's actually been created somewhen last
year.
Regards, Niklas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visi
Hi Internals.
To explain my vote, I'm voting no for pretty much the same reasons I
listed before, http://news.php.net/php.internals/90352
The short version of which is:
* 'friendship' is not a good solution for allowing restricted access
to some methods.
* Restricting access to some methods doe
I really like this. But the name "friend" sounds strange. Is not possible
think about alternative names? Maybe "accessible from X" or "allow X".
Em sex, 6 de jul de 2018 17:25, Dustin Wheeler escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> I've let this RFC linger for a long time and finally wrapped up the
> remaining a
Hello,
I've let this RFC linger for a long time and finally wrapped up the
remaining administrative items to put it to vote. This has been
discussed a few times in the past:
https://externals.io/message/89732
https://externals.io/message/90311
I would like to open the vote for an RFC to support
