On 2025-03-14 16:24, Viktor Khramov wrote:
Hey Juris.
I have a question about this feature.
At the example blow
interface A
{
public function x(Foo $foo);
}
interface B
{
public function x(Bar $foo);
}
class Test implements ?A, ?B
{
}
what would happen if both interfaces existed?
Hi Vi
Hey Juris.
I have a question about this feature.
At the example blow
interface A
> {
>public function x(Foo $foo);
> }
>
> interface B
> {
>public function x(Bar $foo);
> }
>
> class Test implements ?A, ?B
> {
> }
>
what would happen if both interfaces existed?
пт, 14 мар. 2025 г. в
On 2025-03-14 16:04, Jorg Sowa wrote:
Hello Juris, There is some uncertainty for me on how this approach
would work with namespaces.
Let's get this example:
https://3v4l.org/bI1Rj
I would expect to get the error message that I forgot to insert `use
Stringable;`.
But with your idea everything
Hey Gina,
On 12.3.2025 06:16:15, Gina P. Banyard wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 March 2025 at 16:37, Juris Evertovskis
wrote:
Hey,
Just a headsup that I plan to start the vote in a couple of days.
Please let me know if there are concerns that might affect your
stance on this proposal.
https://wik
Hello Juris,
There is some uncertainty for me on how this approach would work with
namespaces.
Let's get this example:
https://3v4l.org/bI1Rj
I would expect to get the error message that I forgot to insert `use
Stringable;`.
But with your idea everything is fine. I don't like such ambiguity and I
On Tuesday, 11 March 2025 at 16:37, Juris Evertovskis wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Just a headsup that I plan to start the vote in a couple of days. Please let
> me know if there are concerns that might affect your stance on this proposal.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/optional-interfaces
I will be voting
Hey,
Just a headsup that I plan to start the vote in a couple of days. Please let
me know if there are concerns that might affect your stance on this
proposal.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/optional-interfaces
BR,
Juris
Hi all,
It's almost awkward to bother the list with this humble RFC amidst so many
exciting proposals :)
With help from Ilija and Niels the implementation is now working and tested,
so the RFC seems getting closer to the voting phase.
Ilija raised a point about optional interfaces not b
Hi Juris
On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 10:16 PM Juris Evertovskis wrote:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/optional-interfaces
Thanks for your efforts.
I've reviewed the patch, it seems there are still a few issues and it
would be great if we could solve them before this goes into voting.
A few thoughts o
Hey,
Thanks for all the feedback!
The RFC is now expanded to explicitly address the concerns on how the
optional interfaces interact with type checks, eval'd interfaces, opcache,
autoloading, reflection and the Override attribute. Did Did I miss
something? Please let me know if anything is
On 28/12/2024 21:56, Juris Evertovskis wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I would like to propose a new syntax that let’s you implement an interface
> only if it exists.
>
>
>
> `class MyClass extends ?OptionalInterface {}`
>
>
>
> If the `OptionalInterface` exists, the class implements it. If no su
On Sat, Dec 28, 2024, 22:58 Juris Evertovskis wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I would like to propose a new syntax that let’s you implement an interface
> only if it exists.
>
>
>
> `class MyClass extends ?OptionalInterface {}`
>
>
>
> If the `OptionalInterface` exists, the class implements it. If no such
>
On Sat, Dec 28, 2024, at 2:56 PM, Juris Evertovskis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new syntax that let’s you implement an
> interface only if it exists.
>
> `class MyClass extends ?OptionalInterface {}`
>
> If the `OptionalInterface` exists, the class implements it. If no such
> in
Hi,
I would like to propose a new syntax that let's you implement an interface
only if it exists.
`class MyClass extends ?OptionalInterface {}`
If the `OptionalInterface` exists, the class implements it. If no such
interface can be found, it is ignored.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/opti
14 matches
Mail list logo
