On Aug 24, 2015 9:38 AM, "Scott Arciszewski" wrote:
>
>
> There is no /dev/urandom on the Windows operating system, so that
> system is not universal.
For tge record, all version of crypto safe RNG (at least mcrypt and
openssl) use the windows crypto API since some time already.
I did not check
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Thomas Bley wrote:
>
>
>
> Nikita Nefedov wrote on 23.08.2015 18:27:
>
> >
> >
> >> On 23 Aug 2015, at 18:37, Thomas Bley wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> consider this code:
> >>
> >> declare(strict_types=0);
> >> ini_set('display_errors', '1');
> >>
> >> function get_rand
Nikita Nefedov wrote on 23.08.2015 18:27:
>
>
>> On 23 Aug 2015, at 18:37, Thomas Bley wrote:
>>
>>
>> consider this code:
>>
>> declare(strict_types=0);
>> ini_set('display_errors', '1');
>>
>> function get_random_int(): int {
>> return false;
>> }
>> echo get_random_int();
>>
>> and th
>
> I guess people continue to use rand() or mt_rand() if they skip the
> documentation.
> Even frameworks which are advertised with 100% php7 compatibility use
> mt_rand().
>
There's nothing wrong with mt_rand() in non-security contexts, it's still
there in PHP 7. If anyone is using mt_rand() in
Larry Garfield wrote on 23.08.2015 18:19:
> On 08/22/2015 07:33 PM, Thomas Bley wrote:
>> Anthony Ferrara wrote on 22.08.2015 21:58:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I am putting a simple RFC up for discussion to make random_* throw
>>> exceptions on failure in order to ensure we fail-closed.
>>>
>>> https:/
> On 23 Aug 2015, at 18:37, Thomas Bley wrote:
>
>
> consider this code:
>
> declare(strict_types=0);
> ini_set('display_errors', '1');
>
> function get_random_int(): int {
> return false;
> }
> echo get_random_int();
>
> and then use strict_types=1
So you're implying that in case of retur
On 08/22/2015 07:33 PM, Thomas Bley wrote:
Anthony Ferrara wrote on 22.08.2015 21:58:
All,
I am putting a simple RFC up for discussion to make random_* throw
exceptions on failure in order to ensure we fail-closed.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/random-function-exceptions
Considering this topic ha
Niklas Keller wrote on 23.08.2015 16:30:
>
>
>> why not have false + e_warning for strict_types=0 and fatal error for
>> strict_types=1 ?
>>
>>
>> Doing function random_int(): int { ...
>
>
> How's this connected to `strict_types`? It's not.
>
>
>> If people use this function without read
>
> why not have false + e_warning for strict_types=0 and fatal error for
> strict_types=1 ?
> Doing function random_int(): int { ...
How's this connected to `strict_types`? It's not.
If people use this function without reading documentation, they will also
> use other things without documentati
Scott Arciszewski wrote on 23.08.2015 02:50:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Thomas Bley wrote:
>> Anthony Ferrara wrote on 22.08.2015 21:58:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I am putting a simple RFC up for discussion to make random_* throw
>>> exceptions on failure in order to ensure we fail-closed.
>>
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Thomas Bley wrote:
> Anthony Ferrara wrote on 22.08.2015 21:58:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I am putting a simple RFC up for discussion to make random_* throw
>> exceptions on failure in order to ensure we fail-closed.
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/random-function-exceptions
Anthony Ferrara wrote on 22.08.2015 21:58:
> All,
>
> I am putting a simple RFC up for discussion to make random_* throw
> exceptions on failure in order to ensure we fail-closed.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/random-function-exceptions
>
> Considering this topic has already been discussed, I in
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> All,
>
> I am putting a simple RFC up for discussion to make random_* throw
> exceptions on failure in order to ensure we fail-closed.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/random-function-exceptions
>
> Considering this topic has already been discu
All,
I am putting a simple RFC up for discussion to make random_* throw
exceptions on failure in order to ensure we fail-closed.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/random-function-exceptions
Considering this topic has already been discussed, I intend to open
voting on this as soon as allowable. Given the
14 matches
Mail list logo
