Hi
On 3/17/23 14:32, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
Yes, your example makes more sense. In my old example the value of the
static variable was already assigned so didn't prove the point it was
trying to make. I adjusted the example in the RFC.
Okay, I believe that resolves all the remarks I ha(ve|d).
Be
Hi Tim
> Isn't the destructor+exception example misleading? In that case the
> initial value of '$x' is constant, thus it should always be known to
> reflection, no?
>
> Should the example look like this:
>
> > function foo($y) {
> > $x = new Foo();
> > static $x = $y;
> > }
> >
> > try {
Hi
Thank you, I've had another read through the RFC.
On 3/16/23 12:51, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
Let me know if anything is still unclear.
Isn't the destructor+exception example misleading? In that case the
initial value of '$x' is constant, thus it should always be known to
reflection, no?
Sh
Hi Alexandru
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arbitrary_static_variable_initializers
>> https://externals.io/message/118976
>>
>> There haven't been many responses, so I'd like to put this to a vote
>> early next week.
>>
> Only a small thing in the example for
> "ReflectionFunction::getStaticVariable
Hi Tim
> Using Alain's example of static variables that depend on each other. For
> the following:
>
> function foo() {
>static $a = 0;
>static $b = $a + 1;
> }
>
> The value of '$a' is known at compile time. Is the value of '$b' also
> known at compile time? It might make sense to include
Hi
On 3/15/23 18:21, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arbitrary_static_variable_initializers
https://externals.io/message/118976
There is an unresolved "question":
Side note: It's been suggested that expressions that can be evaluated
constantly continue to do so. This would mean
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023, 14:02 Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> Hi everybody
>
> It's been a while since I've announced this RFC.
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arbitrary_static_variable_initializers
> https://externals.io/message/118976
>
> There haven't been many responses, so I'd like to put this to a vote
> ea
Hi Tim
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arbitrary_static_variable_initializers
> > https://externals.io/message/118976
>
> There is an unresolved "question":
>
> > Side note: It's been suggested that expressions that can be evaluated
> > constantly continue to do so. This would mean that some express
Hi Alain
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arbitrary_static_variable_initializers
> > https://externals.io/message/118976
>
> Could I suggest that you make something like the following throw an error:
>
> function foo($i) {
> static $a = $b + 1;
> static $b = $i;
> }
>
> You could try to reor
Hi
On 3/15/23 13:02, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
It's been a while since I've announced this RFC.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arbitrary_static_variable_initializers
https://externals.io/message/118976
There haven't been many responses, so I'd like to put this to a vote
early next week.
There is an unre
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 01:02:04PM +0100, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> Hi everybody
>
> It's been a while since I've announced this RFC.
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arbitrary_static_variable_initializers
> https://externals.io/message/118976
>
> There haven't been many responses, so I'd like to put this
Hi everybody
It's been a while since I've announced this RFC.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arbitrary_static_variable_initializers
https://externals.io/message/118976
There haven't been many responses, so I'd like to put this to a vote
early next week.
Ilija
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Developme
12 matches
Mail list logo
