I really think that the implicit `match (true) {` is an easily understood
behavior.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 11:04 AM Guilliam Xavier
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 4:24 PM Larry Garfield
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021, at 1:49 PM, Mark Tomlin wrote:
> > > Please excuse the year long bump
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 4:24 PM Larry Garfield
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021, at 1:49 PM, Mark Tomlin wrote:
> > Please excuse the year long bump, but I was hoping to draw some more
> > attention to the implicit "match (true)" case. I'm just a regular user of
> > PHP, nothing too fancy, just one
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021, at 1:49 PM, Mark Tomlin wrote:
> Please excuse the year long bump, but I was hoping to draw some more
> attention to the implicit "match (true)" case. I'm just a regular user of
> PHP, nothing too fancy, just one of the many, many people around the world
> who use PHP. When I
Please excuse the year long bump, but I was hoping to draw some more
attention to the implicit "match (true)" case. I'm just a regular user of
PHP, nothing too fancy, just one of the many, many people around the world
who use PHP. When I first started using match statements, I thought it was
a natu
Hi Davey
> I mean, ultimately, it's equivalent to:
>
> echo (function($match) {
> if ($match === Lexer::T_SELECT) {
> return $this->SelectStatement()
> }
> if ($match === Lexer::T_UPDATE) {
> return $this->UpdateStatement()
> }
> if ($match === Lexer::T_DELETE)
Hi Larry
> > > My one question is why you're not including the implicit "match (true)"
> > > in this version, when the secondary vote on the previous RFC was
> > > 80% in favor of it.
> >
> > I received quite a bit of feedback that the RFC was too complex. I
> > tried to make the RFC simpler by re
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 4:09 AM Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> Hi internals
>
> I'd like to announce the match expression v2 RFC:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/match_expression_v2
>
> The goal of the new draft is to be as simple and uncontroversial as
> possible. It differs from v1 in the following ways:
>
>
On Fri, May 22, 2020, at 10:42 AM, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> Hi Larry
>
> > My one question is why you're not including the implicit "match (true)"
> > in this version, when the secondary vote on the previous RFC was
> > 80% in favor of it.
>
> I received quite a bit of feedback that the RFC was too
Hey Ilija,
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 1:08 PM Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> Hi internals
>
> I'd like to announce the match expression v2 RFC:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/match_expression_v2
> [...]
> Given that many people have said without blocks they'd vote yes I'd
> say this is the case here. Let me kn
Hi Larry
> My one question is why you're not including the implicit "match (true)"
> in this version, when the secondary vote on the previous RFC was
> 80% in favor of it.
I received quite a bit of feedback that the RFC was too complex. I
tried to make the RFC simpler by removing all non-essentia
On Fri, May 22, 2020, at 6:08 AM, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> Hi internals
>
> I'd like to announce the match expression v2 RFC:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/match_expression_v2
>
> The goal of the new draft is to be as simple and uncontroversial as
> possible. It differs from v1 in the following ways:
>
Hi internals
I'd like to announce the match expression v2 RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/match_expression_v2
The goal of the new draft is to be as simple and uncontroversial as
possible. It differs from v1 in the following ways:
* Blocks were removed
* Secondary votes were removed
* optional
12 matches
Mail list logo
