On 21/06/11 07:41, Arpad Ray wrote:
>
I also think once that functionality is there the next request will be
get_registered_shutdown_functions()
or something along the lines.
>>> I don't see of what use that could be.
>> Completeness? "Has that stupid shutdown func been
2011/6/20 Johannes Schlüter :
>
> (any reason you sent this privately?)
Nope, must have hit the wrong button ;) back to the list now.
>
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:38:50 +0100, Arpad Ray wrote:
>> 2011/6/20 Johannes Schlüter :
>>> Why do you register a shutdown function if you want to remove it aga
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 07:36 +0100, Arpad Ray wrote:
> This patch implements unregister_shutdown_function(), which removes a
> function already registered with register_shutdown_function().
>
> It resolves request #53702 (according to google, not sure if it's
> still active) and I've thought it a c
Hi,
This patch implements unregister_shutdown_function(), which removes a
function already registered with register_shutdown_function().
It resolves request #53702 (according to google, not sure if it's
still active) and I've thought it a curious absence for a while.
The patch (against trunk) is
