Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some improvement proposals

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:23:32 +0100 "Thies C.Arntzen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am 08.12.2003 um 12:11 schrieb Antony Dovgal: > PS: if you want to take over start working on it. i'll help whenever i > can. Ok. After careful thought, I've decided to take it over, if nobody objects. --- WBR,

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some improvement proposals

Am 08.12.2003 um 12:11 schrieb Antony Dovgal: It seems, that you misunderstood me. I meant this: Almost every function, that deals with Lobs, calls OciLobGetLength every time it's being called. And I propose to use oci_lobgetlen(), which will decide - is it necessary to call OciLobGetLength or we

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some improvement proposals

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:46:02 +0100 "Thies C.Arntzen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am 08.12.2003 um 10:12 schrieb Antony Dovgal: > > > > so should I add oci_lobgetlen() instead of OCILobGetLength calls after > > this statement? > > or this code is considered to be working and should not be changed

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some improvement proposals

Am 08.12.2003 um 10:12 schrieb Antony Dovgal: so should I add oci_lobgetlen() instead of OCILobGetLength calls after this statement? or this code is considered to be working and should not be changed anymore? and what about deprecating old syntax, that doesn't meet naming conventions? i don't

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some improvement proposals

On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 08:46:33 +0100 "Thies C.Arntzen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am 05.12.2003 um 17:02 schrieb Antony Dovgal: > > feel free to improve it, remember open source is not about moaning > about the quality of other ppls code, but to contribute. I'm just arguing for and not moanin

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some improvement proposals

On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Thies C.Arntzen wrote: >BTW: i have no idea what you are talking about, sure i would do things >different now - but it works today and another quote starts with "never >change..." ..code that works? See this: http://bugs.php.net/search.php?cmd=display&status=Open&bu

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some improvement proposals

Am 05.12.2003 um 17:02 schrieb Antony Dovgal: On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:08:49 +0100 Maxim Maletsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: it's been a while as I was mentioning that the naming convention for OCI8* functions should change into something like oracle_*. Problem is that there is also an old ora_* set

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some improvement proposals

Am 06.12.2003 um 00:41 schrieb Jani Taskinen: I had the impression that the 'other' oracle extension is somewhat deprecated and unsupported already? (next one to be moved to sibe..PECL ? :) feel free to move bothe oracle and oci to PECL. re, tc (a _strong_ believer that all extensions

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some improvement proposals

t;> --Wez. >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Antony Dovgal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Friday, December 05,

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some improvement proposals

Hello Antony, Friday, December 5, 2003, 5:02:23 PM, you wrote: > On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:08:49 +0100 > Maxim Maletsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> it's been a while as I was mentioning that the naming convention for >> OCI8* functions should change into something like oracle_*. Problem is >>

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some improvement proposals

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:08:49 +0100 Maxim Maletsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > it's been a while as I was mentioning that the naming convention for > OCI8* functions should change into something like oracle_*. Problem is > that there is also an old ora_* set of functions. imho oci8_* is quite

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some improvement proposals

l Message - > From: "Antony Dovgal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 1:30 PM > Subject: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some improvement proposals

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 15:58:49 +0100 "Thies C.Arntzen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'm all for it. > > just go ahead, apply for a cvs-account and start hacking;-) I already have one, but there is not enough karma to hack anything, except peardoc/peardoc-ru. --- WBR, Antony Dovgal aka tony2001 [E

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some improvement proposals

Am 05.12.2003 um 14:42 schrieb Antony Dovgal: On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 13:37:29 - "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Would it make sense to expose this stuff as a stream using the streams API, so the user would be able to fread($lob) etc? yes, I've been thinking about it as an option. I just w

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some improvement proposals

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 13:37:29 - "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would it make sense to expose this stuff as a stream using > the streams API, so the user would be able to fread($lob) etc? yes, I've been thinking about it as an option. I just want to hear a principal answer about this

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some improvement proposals

]> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 1:30 PM Subject: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some improvement proposals > Hi, all! > > I want to propose a patch, that will add functions listed below to OCI8 extension. > Similar functions exist in Postgres & Informix extensions, but they

[PHP-DEV] [PATCH] for oci8 and some improvement proposals

Hi, all! I want to propose a patch, that will add functions listed below to OCI8 extension. Similar functions exist in Postgres & Informix extensions, but they are absent in OCI8 module. The patch is being used on 4 my servers (development, test & 2 production servers) about a week and seems to