tall it from the Add/Remove programs. It's IIS 5.1, which should be
> good enough.
Thanks, I didn't known that. I did not have a Professional version of Windows
but I will try to get one.
>
> >>
> >> Andi
> >>
> >>
> >> > -Original Message-
>
Hi,
On Thursday 21 August 2008 09:37:12 Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>
> Arnaud Le Blanc wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tuesday 19 August 2008 09:22:46 Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> >> Hi Arnaud,
> >>
> >> Arnaud Le Blanc wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Monday 18 August 2008 19:46:46 Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Hi
Arnaud Le Blanc wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 09:22:46 Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi Arnaud,
Arnaud Le Blanc wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 18 August 2008 19:46:46 Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi Arnaud,
The patch looks very interesting.
I think it may be committed to the HEAD in the nearest future.
I do
opment; Johannes Schlüter
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] ZTS as fast as non-ZTS
>
> Hi,
>
> Just as a clarification, it is Johannes and my understanding that this
> is not targeted for inclusion into 5.3.0.
>
> regards,
> Lukas
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP R
Windows XP Professional have IIS, all you need is your CD and then
install it from the Add/Remove programs. It's IIS 5.1, which should be
good enough.
>>
>> Andi
>>
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Arnaud Le Blanc [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi,
Just as a clarification, it is Johannes and my understanding that this
is not targeted for inclusion into 5.3.0.
regards,
Lukas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
er
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.php.net
> NSAPI SAPI developer
> Bremen, Germany
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Arnaud Le Blanc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 7:00 AM
> > To: Andi Gutmans
> > Cc: PHP Development
> &g
August 18, 2008 10:00 PM
> > To: Andi Gutmans
> > Cc: PHP Development
> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] ZTS as fast as non-ZTS
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yes, I have looked for the issue with --with-tsrm-full-__thread-tls
> and there
> > are effectively
Hi,
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 09:22:46 Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Hi Arnaud,
>
> Arnaud Le Blanc wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday 18 August 2008 19:46:46 Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> >> Hi Arnaud,
> >>
> >> The patch looks very interesting.
> >> I think it may be committed to the HEAD in the nearest futur
August 19, 2008 12:23 AM
> To: Arnaud Le Blanc
> Cc: PHP Development; Stas Malyshev; Andi Gutmans
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] ZTS as fast as non-ZTS
>
> Hi Arnaud,
>
> Arnaud Le Blanc wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday 18 August 2008 19:46:46 Dmitry S
t 18, 2008 10:00 PM
> To: Andi Gutmans
> Cc: PHP Development
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] ZTS as fast as non-ZTS
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I have looked for the issue with --with-tsrm-full-__thread-tls
and there
> are effectively some issues.
>
> When building PIC code, th
2008 7:00 AM
> To: Andi Gutmans
> Cc: PHP Development
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] ZTS as fast as non-ZTS
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I have looked for the issue with --with-tsrm-full-__thread-tls and
> there
> are effectively some issues.
>
> When building PIC co
Hi Arnaud,
Arnaud Le Blanc wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 18 August 2008 19:46:46 Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi Arnaud,
The patch looks very interesting.
I think it may be committed to the HEAD in the nearest future.
I don't have time to look into all details in the moment.
Could you explain why --with-tsrm
Andi
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Arnaud Le Blanc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 7:19 PM
> > To: PHP Development
> > Subject: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] ZTS as fast as non-ZTS
> >
> > Hi,
> >
#x27;( ).
Andi
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud Le Blanc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 7:19 PM
> To: PHP Development
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] ZTS as fast as non-ZTS
>
> Hi,
>
> Currently the way globals work forces to pass a thread-loc
Hi!
I'm agree with you, but actually TSRM does more that just allocating and
storing globals. For instance it keeps track of constructors and destructors
so that it can call them automatically when a new thread starts or stops. It
also allows to retrieve the globals of an other thread, etc.
Hi,
On Monday 18 August 2008 22:26:20 Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > The following patch caches each global address in a native TLS variable so
> > that accessing a global is as simple as global_name->member. This removes
the
> > requirement of passing the tls pointer across function ca
Hi,
On Monday 18 August 2008 19:46:46 Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Hi Arnaud,
>
> The patch looks very interesting.
> I think it may be committed to the HEAD in the nearest future.
> I don't have time to look into all details in the moment.
>
> Could you explain why --with-tsrm-full-__thread-tls doesn
Hi!
The following patch caches each global address in a native TLS variable so
that accessing a global is as simple as global_name->member. This removes the
requirement of passing the tls pointer across function calls, so that the two
major overheads of ZTS builds are avoided.
I think it wou
Hi Arnaud,
The patch looks very interesting.
I think it may be committed to the HEAD in the nearest future.
I don't have time to look into all details in the moment.
Could you explain why --with-tsrm-full-__thread-tls doesn't work with
dlopen() however --with-tsrm-__thread-tls does?
Did you t
Hi,
Currently the way globals work forces to pass a thread-local-storage pointer
across function calls, which involves some overhead. Also, not all functions
get the pointer as argument and need to use TSRMLS_FETCH(), which is slow. For
instance emalloc() involves a TSRMLS_FETCH(). An other ove
21 matches
Mail list logo
