Patch applied to HEAD / PHP_5_3.
--Jani
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:57 -0400, David Soria Parra wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> so based on a discussion of php.pecl we thought about using the php_getopt
> for the PHP_FUNCTION(getopt) instead of the system provided getopt. Here
> is the patch for that. H
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:02 -0700, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> > David has a point here. So first of all we should move getopt
> > implementation out of CLI/CGI and into main. Could you do that
> > first Jani?
>
> Why one would need getopt outside of cgi/cli? I.e. where would these
> options co
> Why one would need getopt outside of cgi/cli? I.e. where would these
> options come from?
initially the idea was to use getopt on windows machines. After proposing
my patch which just includes the NetBSD getopt(), there was a
recommandation in php.pecl to use the php_getopt instead of the syste
David has a point here. So first of all we should move getopt
implementation out of CLI/CGI and into main. Could you do that
first Jani?
Why one would need getopt outside of cgi/cli? I.e. where would these
options come from?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 19:13 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> Thread safe for CGI and CLI ? :)
> Or do you find the function useful outside those SAPIs?
Well David's plan is to use the implementation for PHP-level getopt()
and I can imagine doing crazy stuff, so if we can make it thread-safe in
a good
Thread safe for CGI and CLI ? :)
Or do you find the function useful outside those SAPIs?
--Jani
Johannes Schlüter kirjoitti:
David,
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:57 -0400, David Soria Parra wrote:
Hi internals,
so based on a discussion of php.pecl we thought about using the php_getopt
for the PH
David,
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:57 -0400, David Soria Parra wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> so based on a discussion of php.pecl we thought about using the php_getopt
> for the PHP_FUNCTION(getopt) instead of the system provided getopt. Here
> is the patch for that. Hopefully someone is reviewing and
Yes, I know about this. I was wondering about this thing long time
ago..just never got around doing anything about it.. :D
But let's wait for PHP 5.3 branch to get opened first.
--Jani
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 14:22 +0200, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Hello Jani,
>
> David has a point here. So firs
Hello Jani,
David has a point here. So first of all we should move getopt
implementation out of CLI/CGI and into main. Could you do that
first Jani?
marcus
Monday, August 6, 2007, 3:57:26 PM, you wrote:
> Hi internals,
> so based on a discussion of php.pecl we thought about using the php_get
Hi internals,
so based on a discussion of php.pecl we thought about using the php_getopt
for the PHP_FUNCTION(getopt) instead of the system provided getopt. Here
is the patch for that. Hopefully someone is reviewing and commiting the
patch as i don't have karma.
It addes main/getopt.c main/php_g
10 matches
Mail list logo
