Who's talking about OO code? Lots of code is functional and requires
register_globals.
BTW, I've talked to ppl who have ported OO apps relatively painlessly too.
At 09:11 16/02/2005 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Yes because a lot of applications/code stil
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Yes because a lot of applications/code still use it. It's off by default
> but we should still enable people to move to PHP 5 whilst allowing old code
> to run.
My experience is that most (OO) code doesn't work when moving anyway...
so this is a bad excu
Derick Rethans wrote:
My experience is that most (OO) code doesn't work when moving anyway...
so this is a bad excuse andi ;-)
If you turn zend.ze1_compatibility_mode on (and a lot of people have to
do that) then the situation is a bit better. Which brings me to the
point that all those E_STRICT
February 16, 2005 5:01 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Fix for bug #31440 (GLOBALS can be by
G/P/Cwhen register_globals=On)
> IMO this is something that should be marked as Won't Fix and hope that
> by PHP 5.2 we can drop register_globals all together. Heck, perhaps we
> can do it
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jani Taskinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 5:01 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Fix for bug #31440 (GLOBALS can be by
G/P/Cwhen register_globals=On)
> IMO this is something that should be marked as Won't Fix and
