Hi Gina,
> Apologies for the delay, to much traffic on the list so I forgot to address
> this.
Don’t worry!
>
>>> - Suggestions for using 64-bit integer types internally for performance
>>
>>
>> This is probably unnecessary. It's already fast enough, so it might be a
>> good idea to consid
On Tuesday, 25 June 2024 at 17:58, Saki Takamachi wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is a reminder as the feature freeze is approaching. I would like to
> restate my current opinion.
Apologies for the delay, to much traffic on the list so I forgot to address
this.
>
> > - Suggestions for using 64-bit
Hi!
This is a reminder as the feature freeze is approaching. I would like to
restate my current opinion.
> - Suggestions for using 64-bit integer types internally for performance
This is probably unnecessary. It's already fast enough, so it might be a good
idea to consider it when we need even
Hi all,
I would like to start additional discussion about BCMath\Number in this thread.
If my summary is incorrect, please let me know.
First, make a list of points to note.
- Suggestions for using 64-bit integer types internally for performance
> If we are not going to use the newfound opa
