Hi Pierre,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> I do not think it has anything to do with OO or procedural but the actual
> gains.
>
> I see none here.
>
Why not?
PHP is distributed with set of APIs. i.e. Libraries.
Tight binding with libraries and language make library update d
On Mar 10, 2015 2:41 PM, "Yasuo Ohgaki" wrote:
>
> Hi Pierre and all,
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Pierre Joye
wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
>> > Hey:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki
wrote:
>> >> Hi Reeze,
>> >>
>> >> On Mon,
Hi Pierre and all,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
> > Hey:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki
> wrote:
> >> Hi Reeze,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:56 PM, reeze wrote:
> >>
> >>> It is a depr
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
> Hey:
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>> Hi Reeze,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:56 PM, reeze wrote:
>>
>>> It is a deprecated warning I won't break code I think.
>>>
>>> This could makes those project more maintain
Hey:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi Reeze,
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:56 PM, reeze wrote:
>
>> It is a deprecated warning I won't break code I think.
>>
>> This could makes those project more maintainable (new PHP programmer could
>> be easier to maintain the code
Hi Reeze,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:56 PM, reeze wrote:
> It is a deprecated warning I won't break code I think.
>
> This could makes those project more maintainable (new PHP programmer could
> be easier to maintain the code without surprise), and it will be trivial to
> fix this. We could move
On 9 March 2015 at 06:44, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:51 AM, reeze wrote:
> > Hi internals,
> >
> > I'd like to deprecate function: sizeof() [1][2], which is an alias of
> > count(). some people
> > expect it return the memory size of the variable.
> >
> > The doc page's[1] use
On 8 March 2015 at 09:39, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Stanislav Malyshev
> wrote:
>
>> > I'd like to deprecate function: sizeof() [1][2], which is an alias of
>> > count(). some people
>> > expect it return the memory size of the variable.
>>
>> Why? So, som
Hi,
On 8 March 2015 at 00:41, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2015-03-07 16:51 GMT+01:00 reeze :
> > Hi internals,
> >
> > I'd like to deprecate function: sizeof() [1][2], which is an alias of
> > count(). some people
> > expect it return the memory size of the variable.
> >
> > The doc pag
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:51 AM, reeze wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I'd like to deprecate function: sizeof() [1][2], which is an alias of
> count(). some people
> expect it return the memory size of the variable.
>
> The doc page's[1] user contributed notes indicate that too.
>
> What do you think?
Hi all,
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Stanislav Malyshev
wrote:
> > I'd like to deprecate function: sizeof() [1][2], which is an alias of
> > count(). some people
> > expect it return the memory size of the variable.
>
> Why? So, some people are wrong, why we need to mess with the language to
Hi!
> I'd like to deprecate function: sizeof() [1][2], which is an alias of
> count(). some people
> expect it return the memory size of the variable.
Why? So, some people are wrong, why we need to mess with the language to
accommodate them?
I don't think it is a good idea.
--
Stas Malyshev
sma
On 7 March 2015 at 20:42, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Well we could make count()/sizeof() work for strings, so that if:
> C:\> php -r "echo sizeof('abc');"
> 3
>
> although it would not really accomplish much imo., I think it is more
> of what background you come from that makes the most
Hi
2015-03-07 18:35 GMT+01:00 Sebastian B.-Hagensen :
> Hi,
> I don't think the alias make sense and is really misleading and I've
> seen sizeof("abc"); often enough (Don't get me wrong that's equally
> bad with count, but sizeof encourages that usage, imo).
> Having two functions that do exactly
On 07/03/15 17:35, Sebastian B.-Hagensen wrote:
> On the other side: Removal of sizeof is doable with a patch release
> for almost all projects and shouldn't really require more than 5 to 10
> minutes (+ time to review the diff) for most projects.
If taken in conjunction with tidying up the IEEE C
Hi,
2015-03-07 17:41 GMT+01:00 Kalle Sommer Nielsen :
> I'm a big -1 on this, while I know it returns the memory size in a C
> perspective, I think it makes perfect sense to remain an alias, it
> would break lots of applications for a very tiny to nothing gain.
I don't think the alias make sense
Hi
2015-03-07 16:51 GMT+01:00 reeze :
> Hi internals,
>
> I'd like to deprecate function: sizeof() [1][2], which is an alias of
> count(). some people
> expect it return the memory size of the variable.
>
> The doc page's[1] user contributed notes indicate that too.
>
> What do you think?
'm a bi
Hi internals,
I'd like to deprecate function: sizeof() [1][2], which is an alias of
count(). some people
expect it return the memory size of the variable.
The doc page's[1] user contributed notes indicate that too.
What do you think?
[1] http://php.net/sizeof
[2] https://github.com/php/php
18 matches
Mail list logo
