I'm not sure if this whole thing is supposed to be tongue-in-cheek or
not, but "making the language more human" seems, to me, to be a
fairly weak argument for making numeric and string literals like `5'
and `"smile"' into objects, adding closures, and altering array
syntax. The given exampl
> I've written a short paper on the future of PHP and I'd appreciate it
> if you folks would take a look at it and exchange your thoughts with
> me.
I agree with Gareth, the premise that everything as objects and web 2.0 is
the future is a little short sighted IMO and possibly a little blinded by
James Crane wrote:
I've written a short paper on the future of PHP and I'd appreciate it
if you folks would take a look at it and exchange your thoughts with
me.
http://www.maraby.com/papers/pushing_php_into_the_web_20_generation
Don't be too skeptical. ;)
Not being funny, but the one thing
I've written a short paper on the future of PHP and I'd appreciate it
if you folks would take a look at it and exchange your thoughts with
me.
http://www.maraby.com/papers/pushing_php_into_the_web_20_generation
Don't be too skeptical. ;)
Cheers!
M.T.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development
