> So... if you want to help make people more aware of the grapheme_*
> functions, one place to start would be editing the documentation for the
> various string, mbstring, and grapheme functions to use consistent
> terminology, and sign-post each other more clearly.
> http://doc.php.net/tutor
On 27 March 2024 23:18:21 GMT, "Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]"
wrote:
>On 26/03/2024 21:14, Casper Langemeijer wrote:
>> If you need someone to help for the grapheme_ marketing team, let me know.
>
>I think a big part of the problem is that very few people dig into the
>complexities of text encoding, an
On 26/03/2024 21:14, Casper Langemeijer wrote:
If you need someone to help for the grapheme_ marketing team, let me know.
I think a big part of the problem is that very few people dig into the
complexities of text encoding, and so don't know that a "grapheme" is
what they're looking for.
Un
2024年3月27日(水) 6:18 Casper Langemeijer :
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024, at 18:15, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> Many of these already exist, such as grapheme_substr. We can't simply change
> the behaviour of the already existing functions due to BC reasons.
>
>
> Wow. I feel very stupid. I feel I should hav
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024, at 18:15, Derick Rethans wrote:
> Many of these already exist, such as grapheme_substr. We can't simply change
> the behaviour of the already existing functions due to BC reasons.
Wow. I feel very stupid. I feel I should have known about grapheme_*, but I
didn't. Oh my, th
On 26 March 2024 17:04:18 GMT, Casper Langemeijer wrote:
>I'd like to address an issue I have with this RFC.
Please don't top reply.
>I'm not sure is solves a problem by itself. If I understand all of this
>correctly this only does what already can be accomplished with
>preg_match_all('/\X/u'
I'd like to address an issue I have with this RFC.
I'm not sure is solves a problem by itself. If I understand all of this
correctly this only does what already can be accomplished with
preg_match_all('/\X/u', ...). The result of this method in my opinion is not
very usefull by itself. I've don
2024年3月26日(火) 5:43 David CARLIER :
>
> I second this, I think it is a good addition which makes a lot of sense.
>
> Cheers.
>
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 20:36, Ayesh Karunaratne wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > 2024年3月9日(土) 15:26 youkidearitai :
>> > >
>> > > Hello, Internals
>> > >
>> > > I created an wiki for
I second this, I think it is a good addition which makes a lot of sense.
Cheers.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 20:36, Ayesh Karunaratne wrote:
> >
> > 2024年3月9日(土) 15:26 youkidearitai :
> > >
> > > Hello, Internals
> > >
> > > I created an wiki for `grapheme_str_split` function.
> > > Please see:
> >
>
> 2024年3月9日(土) 15:26 youkidearitai :
> >
> > Hello, Internals
> >
> > I created an wiki for `grapheme_str_split` function.
> > Please see:
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/grapheme_str_split
> >
> > I would like to "Under Discussion" section.
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Yuya
> >
> > --
> > -
2024年3月9日(土) 15:26 youkidearitai :
>
> Hello, Internals
>
> I created an wiki for `grapheme_str_split` function.
> Please see:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/grapheme_str_split
>
> I would like to "Under Discussion" section.
>
> Best Regards
> Yuya
>
> --
> ---
> Yuya Hamada (te
Hello, Internals
I created an wiki for `grapheme_str_split` function.
Please see:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/grapheme_str_split
I would like to "Under Discussion" section.
Best Regards
Yuya
--
---
Yuya Hamada (tekimen)
- https://tekitoh-memdhoi.info
- https://github.com/y
12 matches
Mail list logo
