as done this way, in such a way, that a child class can be
> > inherited with parent class construction.
>
> > Jason
>
> > Stefan Walk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 08:03:12PM -0700, Jason Davidson wrote:
>
I made a few typos in my last post.. i should proof read a little.
- parents defualt constructor ( one with arguments). should be 'without'
arguments
- that a child class can be inherited with parent class construction.
should be 'without' parent class /..
sorry..
jason
--
PHP Internals -
rited with parent class construction.
Jason
Stefan Walk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 08:03:12PM -0700, Jason Davidson wrote:
> > Hi, is there a reason that when a child class is instantiated the parent
> > class constructor does not get
Hi, is there a reason that when a child class is instantiated the parent
class constructor does not get called?
The obvious workaournd for this is to simply call
$this->parentConstructor(); in the child class constructor, however,
this seems strange..
Am i way off base here...?
Thanks
Jason
--
Andrey Hristov wrote:
Hi,
jason davidson wrote:
I like the idea of passing an array of needles, I wonder if you could
just add the ability to pass a needles array to in_array, rather than
create a new function.
Anyways, it adds flexability, I would use it.
Jason
Unfortunately, in_array
Andrey Hristov wrote:
Hi,
I didn't write this function to be faster. You asked about
array_intersect()
and I decided to bechmark (you didn't ask for it though). What I had
in mind
when I decided to write it was to escape this :
if (in_array("some_element", $haystack) && in_array("other_element",
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Banyai Zsolt wrote:
The funcionality is the same. But i think it could have place in the
date() function... or no? :)
If it's the same why add a new modifier?
Derick
I agree date should have it, week of year is a common format for a date
fu
Timm Friebe wrote:
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 00:29, Alan Knowles wrote:
This has been discussed before on the mailing list, (either this or ZE2)
and rejected. - have a look through the archives
http://zend.com/phorum/read.php?num=6&id=242&loc=0&thread=242
- Timm
THanks for the thread, i
variable namespace)
b) the same (or similar) result, could easily be done using aliases,
eg.
$a = &$this->xxx->
$a->doThis();
rather than
with ($this->xxx->yyy) {
doThis();
}
Regards
Alan
jason davidson wrote:
If someone could help me find the discusions on the topic
If someone could help me find the discusions on the topic, i would
greatly appreciate it. I searched and have not found anything yet. Or
if someone could explain why the idea was rejected.
Thanks
jason
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.p
Derek Ford wrote:
This is highly unusual I recently started gathering people who
could implement and opinions of those who wanted or didn't want a
'with' construct.
http://www.phpfreaks.com/forums/topic11451.php
I toyed with the idea, and then when I went into core to implement it,
I beca
Here is javascripts implementation of the with construct.
http://devedge.netscape.com/library/manuals/2000/javascript/1.3/reference/stmt.html#1004910
im not as fond of that kind of implementation, but the idea is the
same. I prefer to have some kind of syntax that indicates you are
calling a met
i agree that it doesnt look very nice that way, with ->property or
->method() , that doesnt negate its usefullness in my mind however.
if it was every imlemented, i would suspect that properties and methods
wouldnt be syntaxed the same way, which, for that reason alone, makes it
unlikely it
Ive seen the Control Flow constuct With ...End With used in VB (yup,
VB.. :)) although im not a fan of VB, i liked the feature, is there any
consideration to this kind of construct for php.
here the only example if it i could find online for anyone that hasnt
seen it before.
http://msdn.microsof
14 matches
Mail list logo
