On 9/05/2021 8:48, Joe Watkins wrote:
I'm aware that bugsnet serves as the disclosure method for security bugs
and github doesn't have a solution to that. Leaving that to one side for
now ...
Just want to weigh in on this item (also mentioned by Stanislav as an
important issue). Although Github
On 24/06/2018 22:09, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>> My position stands: I *strongly* object. If we rush to PHP 8 then it
>> will be at
>> least 4-5 more years before we have another chance for breakages in PHP 9. We
>> can add features yearly.
> Fair enough, your position is obviously entirely up to you -
On 7/05/2016 1:34, Raja Kulasekaran wrote:
I have encrypted php Application codebase which I may or may not have
access.
So, I would like to know how the application behaving / profiling Database
queries through the .so or .dll level .
Is there any php extension available which help me out to g
On 15/03/2015 20:30, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I don't think it's going to far, if you have people with no clue writing
this:
https://plus.google.com/+KristianK%C3%B6hntopp/posts/ijoDNH2M8mB
Do you know who Kristian is and how instrumental he was in the proliferation
of PHP? How can you bring your
I suppose http://pecl.php.net/package-stats.php could help there
Kind regards,
Wim
On 14/01/2015 18:53, Julien Pauli wrote:
Hello,
Had a discussion with Rasmus today.
It would be cool if we could have a PHP7 compat of our top-10 Pecl
extensions before our first PHP7 RC.
This will allow mor
On 10/09/2014 3:32, Andrea Faulds wrote:
Some further thoughts after discussing with Tyrael (Ferenc) on IRC.
I initially thought that I’m not really against removing them really, but I
think we should have a script to convert them first. Because someone,
somewhere, is gonna need it.
But then
On 16/08/2014 0:43, Pierre Joye wrote:
Here we have two issues, whether or not we need a 5.x to prepare 7 and if
one year Dev time is enough.
IMHO, that'll depend on which feature will be added/changed/refactored
for 7. I might have missed that discussion, but so far I haven't seen a
wishlist
Michael Shadle wrote:
I'm aware people complain about PHP flaws, but having misc global core
functions for strings, arrays and other data types is a new one.
I am still a purest at heart and don't see the need for namespacing in general.
I am thinking it provides some lower level memory space
I'm going to say exactly the same thing :
-1 for introducing a new Annotations concept and associated syntax
+1 for adding APIs to parse doc blocks
Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 16:34 16/09/2010, Guilherme Blanco wrote:
So the question to be answered is: Should PHP support Annotations?
-1 for int
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Am 15.08.2010 15:42, schrieb Wim Godden:
Looking forward to any feedback !
Have you looked at http://github.com/troelskn/php-tracer-weaver? It is
similar to what you are doing (though not integrated with PHPUnit).
First time I came across this. But
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Am 12.08.2010 10:31, schrieb Derick Rethans:
Well, PHP wouldn't support it directly. But it would allow a zend
extension like Xdebug to provide a strict validation function while
debugging and development. Very similar to the overloaded zend_error_cb
and var_dump() fu
11 matches
Mail list logo
