Re: [PHP-DEV] PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...)

2014-10-25 Thread Weinand Bob
> Am 25.10.2014 um 17:37 schrieb Sebastian Bergmann : > > Am 25.10.2014 um 13:00 schrieb Weinand Bob: >> It’s known that all the development currently is going on in >> krakjoe/phpdbg github repo. > > Why is that, exactly? I find it weird that something that is shipp

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...)

2014-10-25 Thread Weinand Bob
Just a minor question, Derick. If you care about phpdbg, why are you only dropping any comment about it by the time it got into php-src repo? It’s known that all the development currently (except for master, but that just was a merge and then a pure rewrite on top of that merge, nothing related

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Safe Casting Functions

2014-10-22 Thread Weinand Bob
. > NULL with ?? seems better than FALSE :) > > but if we talk about safety, we should be able to relay on to_int() return > value without additional checks. > > Thanks. Dmitry. > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Weinand Bob <mailto:bobw...@hotmail.com>> wrote: &g

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Safe Casting Functions

2014-10-22 Thread Weinand Bob
So, what exactly changes here if we have a second parameter or just return null by default? It doesn’t make any difference, it’s just another way to write it: to_int($a, $default) or to_int($a) ?? $default Also, if you want exceptions, you always can wrap a userland function around it — but I’d