It seems this one should be addressed before RC1 IMO
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=27227
Walt
Quoting Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hey,
>
> I've fixed all of the major bugs I wanted to get done for RC1.
> The only thing we should finalize is the hasMore() thing (I wouldn't want
> to ch
I say keep compatibility. If you want to enforce this, then declare an
interface. That is after all why they exist.
Walt
> Hello,
>
> in the latest snapshot i found some very important differences to the php5
> beta 4 version concerning the behavior of inherited classes. please look at
> the f
Quoting Vivian Steller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Walter A. Boring IV wrote:
>
> > I say keep compatibility. If you want to enforce this, then declare an
> > interface. That is after all why they exist.
> >
> > Walt
> ...
>
> Would be nice if yo
Quoting Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> a) your system is borked
> b) your tools are borked
> c) your sources are borked
>
> Works fine for me.
>
> FYI: It's considered good practise to try with the minimal
> set of configure options before reporting anyth
Howdy,
I'm trying to build php5 from cvs. I'm running on redhat 9. At the end of
the compile, the linker seems to bail.
/usr/bin/ld: .libs/libphp5.so: undefined versioned symbol name operator
delete(void*)@@GLIBCPP_3.2
/usr/bin/ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: Bad value
collect2: ld re
Howdy,
I'm playing with php5 (from cvs), and came accross a strange error
that doesn't happen with php4. Maybe someone can shed some light on
this for me?
I get the error
"Fatal error: Only variables or references can be returned by reference
in /home/waboring/devel/html/test.php on line 11"
