On 02/03/2012 08:28 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> The reasons why I've opened #657698 was just, because I though it could
> be possible for the PHP maintainers to reduce their burden, by just
> offering both, packages with suhosin and without.
> If there are bugs in the with suhosin version
a build flag be used, so
that you can choose security or speed depending on your
needs? If you do some:
#ifdef ENABLE_SLOWER_SUHOSIN_SECURITY
in the controversial parts, then I don't see how this
would be of trouble for anyone to have Suhosin included
in upstream PHP.
Cheers,
Thomas Goira
On 02/01/2012 06:11 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking that it could be a good idea (after current version migrates
> to testing) to upload 5.4RCx to unstable to begin work on transition as soon
> as possible. RC releases should have stable API(?), so application wise
> there's no pro
ed when switching from 4 to 5. That is, of course, if we
have enough human time to work on this. I hope that upstream PHP
maintainers will also maintain 5.x for a while when they will start
advising to switch to 6.
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
