Thank you! Seems like Enum covers this case.
вс, 1 авг. 2021 г., 21:58 Rowan Tommins :
> On 01/08/2021 16:59, Serhii Smirnov wrote:
> > class Features
> > {
> > const FEATURE_FLAG_WITH_SOME_LONG_NAME =
> > 'feature_flag_with_some_long_name';
> >
> 1 авг. 2021 г., в 17:08, Rowan Tommins написал(а):
>
> On 01/08/2021 12:21, Serhii Smirnov wrote:
>> instead of defining constants like:
>> const FOO = 'FOO';
>>
>> they could be defined like:
>> autoconst FOO; // defines a constant FOO with
ror in the classic const definition?
> 1 авг. 2021 г., в 15:00, Max Semenik написал(а):
>
> вс, 1 авг. 2021 г., 14:22 Serhii Smirnov <mailto:free.smile...@gmail.com>>:
> instead of defining constants like:
> const FOO = 'FOO';
>
> they could be defined lik
Hello!
This is my first RFC proposal. I have an idea about introducing autoconst
keyword.
Motivation:
reduce duplicated code (copy/pasting constant name as value)
reducing potential typo errors in constant values
instead of defining constants like:
const FOO = 'FOO';
they could be defined like:
