On Aug 13, 2005, at 6:50 PM, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Sara Golemon wrote:
This is the first one that comes to my mind:
int strpos (string haystack, mixed needle [, int offset])
And this is why they're inconsistent to begin with. When I look
at strpos() I think: strc
On Aug 12, 2005, at 3:33 PM, Lukas Smith wrote:
+1 on all the mentioned items, except for case sensitivity for
identifiers where I am -1 (I dont see the benefit).
Aside from that I wouldnt mind an aggressive function name and
parameter order clean up. We could provide a BC lib via runkit (
On Mar 15, 2005, at 8:34 AM, Lukas Smith wrote:
Hi,
with the help of some PDO users I have begun assembling some
additional information on my wiki:
http://oss.backendmedia.com/index.php?area=PDO
Just FYI, but there's another wiki devoted to PDO at:
http://wiki.cc/php/PDO
But I'm sure many people h
On Feb 17, 2005, at 2:55 PM, Jason Garber wrote:
Hello,
Speaking of these matters, how about implementing functions within
interfaces?
That is by definition impossible. Instead of being an interface, it
would be an implementation.
-ryan
--
Best regards,
Jasonmail
On Feb 15, 2005, at 12:32 AM, Chris Cranford wrote:
Is there any particular commenting style in a PHP extension that lends
itself to being used for documentation like there is with java and a
javadoc?
http://pear.php.net/package/phpdocumentor/
-ryan
--
http://theryanking.com/blog
smime.p7s
Descri
On Feb 14, 2005, at 9:26 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
D.Walsh wrote:
On Feb 14, 2005, at 23:49, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:
Well, that's below 2.5.11, which is what we currently require, so
those folks are already out of luck.
Meanwhile, Mac OS 10.4 is at 2.6.16, so that's okay. I don't have a
1
On Feb 11, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Wez Furlong wrote:
It's the weekend, time for relaxation and recreational hacking.
The perfect opportunity to give PDO a whirl :-)
Please *do* try it out soon as you can; with PHP 5.1 beta due on the
first of March, it's really important to make sure that we don't have
On Feb 1, 2005, at 9:27 PM, Sean Coates wrote:
Ryan King wrote:
Then the constant really just becomes a callback and I can add
anything in that I want.
IMO, this is what array_walk(...) is for.
Especially if pre- and post-filter $_SUPERGLOBALs are made available.
I'm not exactly sure what y
On Feb 1, 2005, at 8:10 PM, Sean Coates wrote:
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
As someone suggested, if the filter function could do $GET =
filt(GET,'*',FILTER_TAGS) or something to that effect then an
individual script could in one shot filter all GET data even if the
default ini filter wasn't in place.
On Feb 1, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Nick Loeve wrote:
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
I don't actually see it as a per-script thing. Obviously the ini
would be per-dir Apache configurable, but I see this as being
something set across the board on a dedicated server that defines
the security
On Feb 1, 2005, at 4:23 PM, Nick Loeve wrote:
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
I don't actually see it as a per-script thing. Obviously the ini
would be per-dir Apache configurable, but I see this as being
something set across the board on a dedicated server that defines
the security policy of that serve
11 matches
Mail list logo
