On 03/11/2015 09:05 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2015 2:10 AM, "Zeev Suraski" wrote:
>>
>> The vote on the Coercive Scalar Type Hints is now open for voting.
>>
>>
>>
>> The latest version of the RFC includes changes discussed on internals@
> last
>> week:
>>
>> 1. Accept string->bool an
On 02/21/2015 09:10 PM, Pádraic Brady wrote:
>
> On the RFC rules themselves, a few comments:
>
> 1. Happy to see leading/trailing spaces excluded.
> 2. Rules don't make mention of leading zeroes, e.g. 0003
> 3. "1E07" might be construed as overly generous assuming we are
> excluding stringy int
On 02/15/2015 08:28 PM, Matteo Beccati wrote:
> On 15/02/2015 19:02, Bob Weinand wrote:
>> I'm probably going to put this into vote tomorrow.
>>
>> The RFC got some update from neutrality aspect and covers some
>> feedback from the initial discussion thread.
>>
>> The link is: https://wiki.php.ne
On 01/14/2015 02:35 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I don’t think we’re ever going to get consensus. But judging by the
> feedback to the v0.1 version, I tend to disagree that the opposers would
> have blocked it. There were certainly opposers – but not that many of them
> as far as I could tell. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/02/13 23:56, Florian Anderiasch wrote:
> On 03.02.2013 23:49, Thomas Bley wrote:
>> Using Debian/Ubuntu, I have "python2.6", "python2.7" and
>> "python3" packages, but only one version of "php5-fpm". Maybe it
>> would be better to have "php5.3-fp
As per Pierre, required for accessing security bugs/repo etc.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 22/09/11 01:41, Alan Knowles wrote:
To clarify
* Code changed to work around this change will not break if it is reverted.
Basically it is to add is_object() before any call to is_a()
* If left as is, there is reasonable potential for remote exploits in
many codebases.
* This change is not
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:39:34 +0200, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 12:03 +0100, Keloran wrote:
As far as I can see there are very few extension that are really needed
in
the core, the main problem comes from distributions changing the methods
that PECL works or the core wor
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:38:00 +0200, Brian Moon wrote:
I like this for the current stable branch, no bc impact and gives a
way to detect such mistakes (not ideal but better than nothing).
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Patrick
ALLAERT wrote:
Hi,
I would like to introduce an E_NOTICE when
nal description of checked ternary I strongly object to this
working on non-arrays.
But given that constraint, my vote goes to the checked ternary operator as
well.
--
Ole Markus With
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:25:45 +0200, Martin Scotta
wrote:
arrays are intent for holding values, not for represent things so use
objects for that.
the need for array_key_exists/isset to check for the presence of an
index is
a smell that you need to refactor your code for a different datatype
.
When it comes to $_POST you probably want to use filter_input instead.
Cheers,
Ole Markus With
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:59:41 +0200, Eloy Bote Falcon
wrote:
What is the purpose of that generateHash function? It doesn't work in the
isset check.
Instead of using a multi-dimensional array, I use a flat array.
Anyway, you can do a simple $a = array('foo'); isset($a[$x][$y][$z])
without
n a second step. However, my views on this
are:
I think it best to avoid discussing the actual syntax before agreeing on
what we really need.
--
Ole Markus With
Systems Architect - Sportradar AS
Developer - Gentoo Linux
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
ted to only work for array elements.
-1 for any other variable type.
--
Ole Markus With
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/09/10 18:00, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 16:34 16/09/2010, Guilherme Blanco wrote:
>> So the question to be answered is: Should PHP support Annotations?
>
> -1 for introducing a new Annotations concept and associated syntax
>
> +1 for adding APIs
16 matches
Mail list logo
