Re: [PHP-DEV] allow_url_fopen should be INI_ALL

2005-06-29 Thread Nelson Menezes
puter's fault? Personally, I always think it's the computer's > fault. So, yes, if people end up doing stupid things, it is because > the computer is wrong. Well, if you are a total end-user, I'd agree with you. But developers do need to take up some responsability to no

Re: [PHP-DEV] forward compatibility "public" in 4.4

2005-06-17 Thread Nelson Menezes
u should think about the level of visibility of its members". If you don't want those reminders, forget about E_STRICT. If you leave E_STRICT enabled but try to bypass it (by declaring everything as public for BC) then you didn't understand what E_STRICT is for... -- Nelson Me

Re: [PHP-DEV] forward compatibility "public" in 4.4

2005-06-16 Thread Nelson Menezes
> placed? > > No, it's a parser keyword and a keyword can't be used as a function name. > > > and if it is so, then this would also be a candidate for > > > > "NOTICE: 'public' is a keyword in PHP 5" in php 4.4 > > No. No "errors"

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1

2005-06-07 Thread Nelson Menezes
uot;annoyance" that is is also subjective, but I personally think that will add some smear to PHP. > All in all, I think if everyone stops being religious about goto, > and logically evaluates it, we can quickly come to a conclusion. I agree. -- Nelson Menezes [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1

2005-06-07 Thread Nelson Menezes
idered when designing major features, and that's all I did. I'm not out on a vendetta: I think we all want "the best" for PHP, even if what "the best" is needs debating. I still think goto is a bad idea for PHP, albeit not-as-bad if implemented with static labels

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1

2005-06-07 Thread Nelson Menezes
ckly be used by those with less experience, with much unmanageable code as a result... hence the implications to PHP reputation. PS: George: sorry about the duplicate; always need to train myself to hit "reply all"... -- Nelson Menezes [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Devel

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1

2005-06-07 Thread Nelson Menezes
HP reputation will suffer as a result. IMHO that's a bad tradeoff when you consider the advantages you get from goto. -- Nelson Menezes [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1

2005-06-07 Thread Nelson Menezes
the shouts of "and who are you to have an opinion?"). I just think it's a bad idea, that's all. -- Nelson Menezes [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1

2005-06-07 Thread Nelson Menezes
I'm learning, as a way to "contribute" more -- thanks for the encouragement, btw!) I stand by my opinion: PHP is not the right tool for building a dedicated parser: if all you have is a hammer... On 6/7/05, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Nelson Meneze

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1

2005-06-07 Thread Nelson Menezes
'spagetticode' - as nobody ever has to > even look at that code. If you want to build a full-blown parser, PHP is not your language. If you need a code generator, you have a problem. -- Nelson Menezes [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php