On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 20:30, Sammy Kaye Powers wrote:
>
> Hey internals!
>
> Given there has been at least two weeks of discussion around the RFC,
> "Improve openssl_random_pseudo_bytes()" and there doesn't seem to be
> any outstanding issues, I have moved the RFC into voting phase.
>
> The voting
Hi,
there are some questions whether PR #3360 (Implement ZEND_ARRAY_KEY_EXISTS
opcode to speed up array_key_exists()) [1] could go into 7.3.0beta2 or not.
This PR adds new opcode, but also significantly improves performance of
array_key_exists(), to the point that it becomes faster than isset().
Hi,
yesterday I was digging into the bug #76510:
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=76510
A strange PHAR- and streams-related issue that only happens for some
users/binaries.
I was able to trace it down to a GCC optimization "optimize-strlen".
Here's when the bug does and does not reproduce:
gcc-8 w
Hi,
the RFC has been declined.
Thank you for voting, and especially thanks to Jordi and Nikita
for explaining their No vote, unlike the rest of No-voters.
Thank you,
M.
2018-07-09 22:13 GMT+02:00 Pedro Magalhães :
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 9:48 PM Michael Moravec wrote:
>>
>>
2018-07-05 22:35 GMT+02:00 Nikita Popov :
> I voted against both functions. Jordi already explained why iterable_count()
> is questionable, so let me add a comment regarding iterable_to_array().
>
> Essentially my gripe is that I'm not convinced of the usefulness of this
> function and am concerne
2018-07-05 16:43 GMT+02:00 Jordi Boggiano :
> Just to explain the No vote for iterable_count, I think we'd rather advocate
> people implement Countable in their iterables than to force the consumption
> of an iterator just to count it as this can have side-effects and render the
> iterator unusabl
2018-07-04 0:23 GMT+02:00 Christoph M. Becker :
>
> Yeah, I'd prefer that. It's not that 2018-07-17 12:00 UTC *couldn't*
> work – it's just I'd rather have some buffer time (I presume there will
> be more RFCs whose voting ends close to feature freeze).
Alright, updated!
RFC voting now closes on
On 03.07.2018 at 22:48, Michael Moravec wrote:
>
> > Hello internals,
> >
> > The RFC for adding iterable_to_array() and iterable_count() is now open
> for
> > voting:
> >
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/iterable_to_array-and-iterable_count
>
> Thanks for the
Hello internals,
The RFC for adding iterable_to_array() and iterable_count() is now open for
voting:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/iterable_to_array-and-iterable_count
You can vote for each function separately.
Voting will close on 2018-07-17 12:00 UTC.
Thank you,
M.
Hi Johannes,
2018-06-20 18:40 GMT+02:00 Johannes Schlüter :
>
> Is there any reason not to extend the existing functions to also allow
> arrays?
>
Yes, this was discussed in the PR on GitHub:
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/3293#issuecomment-397082988
There are two main reasons to not do th
lue sounds like a way worse option in terms of
consistency and compatibility.
A PR with implementation for iterable_to_array() is already submitted,
iterable_count() to be added soon.
Looking forward for your feedback.
Thanks!
Michael Moravec
no BC break to user-land is involved.
This RFC comes with a rather simple PR:
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/2603
Please let me know what you think or if you find anything unclear.
Thanks!
Michael Moravec
Hello everyone,
I'd like to request a Wiki karma to be able to create an RFC for adding the
mixed type.
There is already a PR for this: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/2603
Wiki username in question is "majkl".
Thank you,
M.
13 matches
Mail list logo
