> On Thursday, Jun 15, 2023 at 12:01 PM, Deleu (mailto:deleu...@gmail.com)> wrote:
>
> One can argue that this change might make it so that users start
> considering adding methods with default implementation as
> not-so-much-a-bc-break and do so without bumping a major version, in which
> case t
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 9:36 PM Craig Francis
wrote:
> I know I keep going on about this very simply example, but it represents a
> fairly typical style of programming PHP, and I just do not understand what
> the problem with it is:
>
> ```
> $search = $request->input('q'); // Laravel, returns NU
On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 11:41 AM, Craig Francis mailto:cr...@craigfrancis.co.uk)> wrote:
> On 26 May 2022, at 15:01, Michael Babker wrote:
> > On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 7:21 AM Craig Francis
> > wrote:
> > > That said, I would still like to know about the benefi
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 7:21 AM Craig Francis
wrote:
> That said, I would still like to know about the benefits of rejecting NULL
> for `htmlspecialchars()`, in the context of that Laravel Blade patch;
> because, if it is beneficial (vs the BC break), they should revert that
> patch... shouldn't
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 2:17 PM Olumide Samson wrote:
> Most of these changes wouldn't have been problematic to you if the
> language has prevented you from writing what we can now consider bad code,
> so please allow the new PHP developer that newly start using PHP to not
> follow that your path
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 2:06 PM Olumide Samson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 8:00 PM Michael Babker
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:51 PM Peter Kokot wrote:
>>
>> > Just a dumb idea, since there clearly is a majority in favor of the
>> > change
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:51 PM Peter Kokot wrote:
> Just a dumb idea, since there clearly is a majority in favor of the
> change with these warnings and strictness and all that now... Why not
> making something like an LTS PHP 7.x where all the legacy code would
> work OK as long as practically
