On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 16:54 -0400, John Coggeshall wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 13:33 -0700, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> > PHP 6 will come with some big changes. We could have a compat flag that
> > supports old-style classes PhpDate if needed.
>
> -100
>
*-10
Assuming it's possible, I would set which PHP version to associate with
.php on a .htaccess or vhost basis.
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 13:52 +0200, Ron Korving wrote:
> What kind of extensions would you suggest people use?
>
> index.php51 ?
>
> - Ron
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Maili
Pierre wrote:
On 5/27/06, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- bool array(array $array)
cehcks whether arra position is valid (e.g. like "key($array) !==
NULL")
I don't understand this one.
I think you have to listen to psychedelic music and take a hit of LSD first.
--
PHP Inter
Write your __set to not allow arrays to be set, and make arrays within
your object private or objects with __set in their own right.
You could in fact create a "CustomArray" or something and allow
CustomArrays to be __set'd in your object, then control their contents
with CustomArray->__set().
That other time, at band camp, Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Aizat Faiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about including the patch, and having a php.ini option to
enable/disable the line numbering.
I dont think this is a good option, perhaps some other trigger
file.phps?numb
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 11:55 -0500, Daniel Convissor wrote:
> Hi Rasmus:
>
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 03:02:02PM -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> >
> > A useful tag filter that understands attributes as well so you can lock
> > down exactly which tags with which attributes you wish to allow through.
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 15:09 +0100, Ron Korving wrote:
> strPos()
> arrayMerge()
> isInt()
> imageCreateFromString()
fEof() or fEOF()?
addCSlashes()?
strIReplace()?
strCSpn()?
stripCSlashes()?
strIPos()?
strIStr()?
strNCaseCmp()?
strNCmp()?
strPBrk()?
strRChr()?
strRIPos()? (That one's my favourite
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 00:46 +1100, Michael Cordover wrote:
> It seems to me, therefore, that we should get rid of the underscores.
> Yes, this means changing a lot more functions around, but adding
> underscores will just make function names MORE confusing where there's
> ambiguity - and that's
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 22:32 +0100, Johannes Schlueter wrote:
> It isn't about the XML standard but about exceptions for the PHP parser and
> why should which all are used (hm, not sure about combination with PHP.
I recall this being discussed before, but not what came of it: is there
a problem
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 21:41 -0500, Nicolas Bérard Nault wrote:
> +2 to <-, which, in my humble opinion, is more logic than anything else that
> was proposed (as mentionned earlier, it creates a sort of "hierachy").
Hmm, is it really necessary to vote for separators which aren't remotely
technicall
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 00:58 +0100, Oliver Grätz wrote:
> - looks OK (Pear%%Date)
You're kidding, right? %% looks nothing but blocky and messy to my human
eyes, and the resemblance to :: stretches the word "tenuous" to its
limit.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscrib
Don't let the identifiers collide, then.
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 23:23 +0100, David Zülke wrote:
> -> is crap because it is used for accessing object methods and
> properties. Come on, guys. It is not that difficult. Think before you
> write.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing L
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 00:06 +0200, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> I wonder what "PHP feel" is in bunch of special symbols with meaning
> entirely obscure to non-initiated... Why not {@ or <* then? They are nice
> ASCII art too. And there are so many combinations of two special symbols,
> let's find
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 14:58 +0100, Christopher Kunz wrote:
> David Zülke wrote:
> > No, please don't. I couldn't reply to your incredibly arrogant messages
> > anymore. After all, someone has to tell you that your "L'Etat, c'est
> > moi" attitude sucks. This is an open-source project, remember?
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 13:38 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Hello Christian,
>
> Saturday, November 26, 2005, 1:42:07 AM, you wrote:
> > PS: I'd rather have : for namespaces with the whitespace restriction for
> > ? a:x : b:y than the confusing (escaping characters outside of a
> > string?) backs
However, in terms of precedents, there are the combined assignment
operators such as &=, +=, .=, and so on. They would suggest that
$a ||= $b;
should be equivalent to
$a = $a || $b;
So I don't think ||= in the suggested usage is intuitive. And adding
strange automagical meanings to $a = $a || $
16 matches
Mail list logo
