On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 9:51 AM Daniel Scherzer
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 12:31 PM Matt Fonda
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> I believe this feature essentially amounts to "add methods which can
>> never be called", which in my mind make
Hi Larry,
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 7:48 PM Larry Garfield
wrote:
> I have to think people are misunderstanding Nikita's earlier comment, or
> perhaps that he phrased it poorly.
>
> The determination of whether a method call is type-compatible with the
> parameters passed to it is made *at runtime
1:27, schrieb Matt Fonda:
> > If an interface adds a method but makes no promises about what
> > parameters
> > it accepts, then why is it part of the interface in the first
> > place--why
> > add a method that can't be used?
>
> It would more cleanly all
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 12:07 PM Daniel Scherzer <
daniel.e.scher...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I'd like to start discussion on a new RFC about allowing `never` for
> parameter types when declaring a method.
>
> * RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/never-parameters-v2
> * Implementation: htt
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:37 AM Jordan LeDoux
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 9:43 AM Matt Fonda wrote:
>
>> Hi Jordan,
>>
>> Thanks for the RFC. I have a couple questions:
>>
>> Suppose I have classes Foo and Bar, and I want to support the following
>&
Hi Jordan,
Thanks for the RFC. I have a couple questions:
Suppose I have classes Foo and Bar, and I want to support the following
operations:
- Foo * Bar (returns Foo)
- Bar * Foo (returns Foo)
If I understand correctly, there are three possible ways I could implement
this:
a) Implement the *
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 7:45 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> My thought here is that a constructor with (only) promoted properties is
> hardly a constructor at all -- it's more like a special syntax for
> declaring properties that happens to re-use the constructor notation,
> because that allows it gene
Hi Mark,
I'm a fan of adding an easy and performant way to implement classmap-based
autolading, but weary of adding yet another way to autoload. If it would be
possible to do so without negating the performance improvements, I'd
suggest having this work in conjunction with the existing
spl_autoloa
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Jesse Schalken
wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I often have code dealing with plain old PHP objects with properties and no
> methods, either as a substitute for keyword arguments, or to represent a
> JSON or YAML document for a web service, configuration file or schema
